CHAPTER II
THE ROMANTIC
FALLACY
TheRenaissanceproducedno
theoryofarchitecture.
Itproduced
treatisesonarchitecture: FraGiocondo,
Alberti, Palladio, Serlio,andmanyothers, notonly
built,
but wrote. But the style theybuilt in was
tooalivetoadmitofanalysis,toopopulartorequire
defence.
They give us rules, but not principles.
Theyhadnoneedoftheory,fortheyaddressedthem-
selves
to
taste. Periods of vigorous production,
absorbedinthe practicalandtheparticular,donot
encourageuniversalthought.
The death of the Renaissance tradition should
have
enabledmen,for
thefirsttime,totakeageneral
viewofitshistory,andtodefineitsprinciples,
if
not
with scientificexactness, at leastwithout provinci-
alityorbias. Ofthe causes which precluded
them
from
sodoing,the
firstwastheprolongedascendency
of
the Romantic
Movement.
tf
TheRomantic Movementcreated,
inallthe arts,
a
deep unrest,
prompting mento newexperiments
;
and,followingontheexperiments,
therecameagreat
enlargement of critical
theory, seeking to
justify
37