THE ROMANTIC
FALLACY
65andthenecessaryconsideration,
andthatinrelationto this the quality of a style should primarily
beappraised. Whetherornot
thatpeculiarenjoymentcan be enriched and surrounded with others of adifferentandmoregeneralnaturemustbeasecond-aryquestion,andonewith whichthecriticism ofagiven art,as
such,need have no concern. When,therefore, our architectural criticscondemn theRenaissance style on this secondary ground beforetheyhavefairlyconsidered
itsclaimsontheprimaryground,this,wemayfairlysay,isunsoundandmis-
leading
criticism, criticism tending to obscure realvalues and diminish
possible enjoyments, criticismvitiatedby
theRomanticFallacy.I