THE ROMANTIC
FALLACY
65
andthenecessary
consideration,
andthatinrelation
to this the quality of a style should primarily
be
appraised. Whetheror
not
thatpeculiarenjoyment
can be enriched and surrounded with others of a
differentand
moregeneralnaturemustbeasecond-
aryquestion,andonewith whichthecriticism ofa
given art,
as
such,
need have no concern. When,
therefore, our architectural critics
condemn the
Renaissance style on this secondary ground before
theyhavefairlyconsidered
itsclaimsontheprimary
ground,this,wemayfairlysay,isunsoundandmis-
leading
criticism, criticism tending to obscure real
values and diminish
possible enjoyments, criticism
vitiatedby
theRomanticFallacy.I