8o THEARCHITECTURE
OF
HUMANISM
and,therefore,againsttheRenaissance—^forhowever
deeply Orderand Proportionmay
characterise thelawsofNature,theyarefartoseekinitsarrangement;secondly,anemphasisonrepresentation, onfidelitytothe naturalfact.
|Thiswassoonmade
apparentinpainting—first, in themicroscopic
realismofthePre-Raphaelites
;later,withmoreregardtothefactsof vision, inimpressionism. Architecture—^an
ab-stractor,attheleast,autilitarianart—
^mighthavebeen expectedto escape. But it containedoneelement which exposedit to attack: it containedarchitectural sculpture. Itfollowed,therefore, thatthiselement, whichadmitted of representationandcouldbepresseddirectlyintothecultandserviceofNature,shouldbecomesupreme.'The
onlyadmira-tion worth having,' it is said in TheSevenLamps,'attachesitselfwhollytothe meaningofthesculp-tureandthecolourofthebuilding.''Proportionofmassesismeredoggerel.' Andnotonlywassculpture
thus
thrust
outof its true relation and made the
chief end and criterion ofarchitecture, but itwas
required,bythesameargument,toberealistic. But
architecture,
ifit meansanything,meansasupreme
controlover all the element? ofa design, with the
righttoarrange,tomodify,toeliminateand
tocon-
ventionalise. Here, instead, arrangement becomes
- doggerel'andconventionablasphemy.
^
In
this,itwillbenoticed,theromanticism of
Naturereacheda