26 Wednesday February 16 2022 | the times
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor should be sent to
[email protected] or by post to
1 London Bridge Street, London SE1 9GF
cleared up years ago by the
negotiation of a formal treaty but
weren’t, and the peoples of the former
Soviet Union are having to live with
the consequences.
Alistair Newton
Theydon Bois, Essex
Sir, Edward Lucas (“The speech that
Liz Truss should have given”,
comment, Feb 14; letters, Feb 15) is
right about Britain’s complacency
over Russian kleptocracy. Beyond the
“enablers” who facilitate money
laundering, there is another form of
enabler, one that seeks to launder
reputations and shut down
journalistic inquiry. The five legal
cases pursued against the journalist
Catherine Belton and her publisher
last year for the book Putin’s People
gave one of the most public insights
into this tactic, often referred to as
SLAPPs (strategic lawsuits against
public participation). The vast
majority of these threats are hidden,
sent to journalists all over the world
by UK lawyers in letters marked
“private and confidential”, threatening
costly legal action if information
about their wealthy clients’ potential
wrongdoing is not scrubbed from the
public record. This is highly damaging
for media freedom, tackling
corruption and ultimately democracy.
The US already has anti-SLAPP laws
in place in some states and recently
recognised their impact in its new
anti-corruption strategy, launching a
global Defamation Defence Fund to
protect journalists from this form of
attack. In the UK we are rightly
proud of our legal system but we must
remain aware of how it can be abused
from within. To add to all of Lucas’s
excellent proposals, the UK needs to
adopt an anti-SLAPP law.
Susan Coughtrie
Project director, the Foreign Policy
Centre think tank
Sir, William Hague draws attention to
Vladimir Putin’s lengthy article on the
historic unity of the Ukrainian and
Russian peoples. I have just read
Putin’s article, which gives a logical,
detailed and clear explanation of his
thinking. Would that Liz Truss had
read it before giving her moralistic
and counterproductive lecture to the
Russian foreign minister, for had she
done so she might have noticed some
areas of common ground on which to
build a lasting peace.
Peter Baron
Chichester
Djokovic’s non-jab
Sir, Novak Djokovic enjoys the
freedom from smallpox and polio that
all of us in the UK enjoy because
millions of citizens were vaccinated to
help to eradicate these dreadful
diseases (“I’d rather miss Grand
Slams than have Covid vaccine”,
thetimes.co.uk, Feb 15). Unfortunately
polio persists in parts of the world
where vaccination has been opposed.
Sadly millions have died during the
coronavirus pandemic. However, we
are now beginning to emerge from
the pandemic in large part because of
the tens of millions of citizens who
have been vaccinated, and as a result
millions of lives have been saved.
Djokovic is quite right that he should
have the freedom to choose not to be
vaccinated but quite wrong if he
believes that his decision is victimless.
John Barnes
Consultant physician, Truro
Keep the Marbles
Sir, It is great news that the Elgin
Marbles could be perfectly copied by a
new high-tech sculpture robot (report,
Feb 14; letter, Feb 15) but the copies,
rather than the originals, should be
sent to Greece, so as to avoid setting a
catastrophic precedent for the future
of Britain’s world-renowned museum.
Today the Greeks; tomorrow every
other disputant.
Phillip Hodson
Tetbury, Glos
Worzel’s awake
Sir, Charlie Flindt may think he has
an original suggestion in his human
bird scarer (letter, Feb 14) but there is
a true version of this, told to me by
my mother. She was born in 1923 and
grew up in Cirencester, where the
local farmer (her grandfather) paid a
small sum to an elderly villager whose
job it was to frighten the crows away.
He was dressed like a scarecrow due
to his poor situation and could be
heard shouting “Away crows”
repeatedly at the top of his voice.
Meriel Goddard
Weybridge, Surrey
Corrections and
clarifications
The Times takes
complaints
about editorial
content seriously. We are committed to
abiding by the Independent Press
Standards Organisation (“IPSO”) rules
and regulations and the Editors’ Code of
Practice that IPSO enforces.
Requests for corrections or
clarifications should be sent by email to
[email protected] or by post to
Feedback, The Times, 1 London Bridge
Street, London SE1 9GF
Persecution of
subpostmasters
Sir, Your leading article on the Post
Office’s scandalous treatment of
hundreds of subpostmasters presents
a picture of a well-resourced state
body relentlessly pursuing individuals
while denying them access to the
tools to mount a robust defence (“Lost
in the Post”, Feb 15).
If and when the questions of
culpability and compensation are
fully addressed, justice must be seen
to be done in an appropriate manner.
Merely paying compensation, which
may simply involve insurers and the
taxpayer, will not be enough.
Individuals in the Post Office must be
identified and, if proven guilty,
punished in a manner consistent with
the way in which they ruined the lives
and livelihoods of innocent
subpostmasters and their families.
SM Southall
East Horsley, Surrey
Sir, While I agree with your leading
article that the commission of inquiry
must rigorously examine every aspect
of the Post Office’s legal action
against innocent subpostmasters, it
must also examine the role played by
the lawyers who advised it to pursue
such wrongful prosecutions. They too,
whether retired or not, must be
named and their partnerships fined
for malpractice.
Alick Moore
Sutton Veny, Wilts
Lecturers’ strike
Sir, Will Hart (letter, Feb 15) is right:
the University and College Union
cares little about students, though to
be fair (and I write as a non-member)
that is not really in its remit; the nature
of university employment means that
it is difficult for academics to withdraw
their labour or otherwise work to rule
in any way that does not negatively
affect students. What has always
amazed me, especially since fees were
imposed, is the immediate and full
support given by so many students’
unions to UCU industrial action that
negatively affects the student body. I’m
also frequently surprised by how many
of my students don’t seem to realise
that their union is doing this.
Dr Amanda Hopkins
Senior teaching fellow, School of
Modern Languages and Cultures,
University of Warwick
How the wheels turn inside Putin’s mind
Sir, The view that Ukraine is an
indivisible part of ancient Russia
probably has much support among
the Russian people, and at one time
might well have had a similar level of
support among Ukrainians (“How
Ukraine crisis plays out in Putin’s
head”, William Hague, comment,
Feb 15). Ukraine was not regarded as
a separate administrative entity until
it was identified as a distinct republic
within the Soviet Union. Even then,
the Crimea did not became part of
the Ukraine until its administration
was transferred from Russia during
the Khrushchev era.
What changed the Ukrainians’ view
from “us” to “them” was the
behaviour of the communist
government in setting up collective
farms and then allowing four million
Ukrainians to starve to death during
the 1930s famine that these farms
brought about.
The agreement to break up the
Soviet Union was negotiated between
the presidents of Russia, Belarus and
Ukraine along with their prime
ministers, in a single series of
meetings at a Belarusian dacha
behind Mikhail Gorbachev’s back.
Unfortunately it left far too many
loose ends, which should have been
Sir, Clare Foges’s analysis of the
impact of the surveillance society is
reassuringly optimistic (“Digital
kompromat is changing our
behaviour”, Feb 14). However, her
analogy with the fear of God is
inaccurate. As the Apostle Paul said in
his letter to the Romans: “All have
sinned and fall short of the glory of
God.” We are all worthy of judgment.
By contrast, in this era of digital
monitoring we may all be sinners but
only some of us are caught on
camera. Of course Paul went on to say
that we are justified — put right —
with God through Christ Jesus. Who
will put us right with society when our
video goes viral? At present, it seems,
there is no one. It’s ironic that in an
increasingly secular society we live
with a holier-than-thou attitude.
Graeme D Watson
Edinburgh
Sir, Digital and divine surveillance are
not as similar as Clare Foges suggests.
People do act differently when they
know they are being watched.
However, unlike with smartphones
and CCTV, there has always been
Caught on camera
reasonable doubt about whether an
invisible God really exists. This
uncertainty preserved some freedom,
so even religious people could still
perform good actions for their own
sake, not just from fear of the
observer. If modern technology now
prevents that, is it really so helpful?
Edward Cain
Teacher of religion and philosophy,
Berkhamsted School
from the times february 16, 1922
BAYONET
CHARGE IN
BELFAST
Partying at work
Sir, If the prime minister is to tell
police that “saying goodbye to staff is
part of working life” (report, Feb 14),
then surely saying goodbye to loved
ones who died during lockdown is
also part of life, yet we were denied
this opportunity. That to me is the
sheer hypocrisy of a self-obsessed,
self-indulgent PM who feels entitled
and quite simply does not get it. He is
clearly not fit for public office, given
the clear evidence of his “one rule for
us, one rule for them” ethos.
John Graveling
Whitley Bay, Tyne and Wear
Sir, The psychiatrist Karl Tomm is
clear on the meaning of saying sorry
(comment, Feb 12; letters, Feb 14). The
expression can only be meaningful if
it shows an understanding of why
the action created an upset or
annoyed an individual or group.
Saying sorry alone never absolves the
speaker of culpability.
Dorothy Reynolds
Billericay, Essex
thetimes.co.uk/archive
Call for fracking
Sir, Lord Goldsmith does not speak
for me or I imagine the millions of
employees whose jobs will be at
increasing risk as their employers
continue to lose competitiveness
because of rocketing energy prices.
(“Fracking ban stays to avoid local
fury”, Feb 14). The ill-informed and
over-emotional campaign by local
pressure groups, coupled with
over-reaction to some very minor
earth tremors, panicked the
government into walking away from
what should have been this country’s
energy escape route from the disaster
we now face. I hope that the more
enlightened of our MPs will continue
to press for fracking to be allowed.
Chris Jeffries
Cross in Hand, E Sussex
IOC and doping
Sir, The decision to allow a 15-year-
old Russian skater to continue to
compete in the Olympics, despite her
being a drugs cheat, says it all about
the International Olympic
Committee, which has clearly
kowtowed to the bullying tactics of
Russia (“Fury at drug cheat reprieve”,
Feb 15). Sport has rarely stood up to
be counted when a soft option has
been available. It raises the question
of what anyone is doing in Beijing at
the moment, other than providing
credibility to a totalitarian regime.
Howard JC Wells
Former CEO, Irish Football
Association; Berkhamsted, Herts
Sir, The IOC says that it “is
committed to promoting sport in
society, strengthening the integrity of
sport and supporting clean athletes”.
One wonders how these principles fit
with the latest doping scandal. In
2019 the World Anti-Doping Agency
banned Russia from international
sports competitions for four years
after it was found to be running a
state-sponsored doping scheme.
However, this ban was circumvented
at the Tokyo Games, and now at
Beijing, by athletes competing as the
Russian Olympic Committee. What, I
wonder, is the point of the IOC?
Judy Winter
Cleeve Prior, Worcestershire
Letters to The Times must be exclusive
and may be edited. Please include a full
address and daytime telephone number.
Yesterday was another day of
murder in Belfast, where the
casualty list for five days now
exceeds 100, including over 30 dead.
Mr Churchill announced in
Parliament yesterday that Mr
Michael Collins, who arrived in
London in the morning, had told
him he had secured the release of 15
of the kidnapped Ulstermen, and
hoped that others would be set free
during the day. The more general
distribution of troops and a
downpour of rain this morning
promised comparatively peaceful
conditions today, but the early calm
was soon broken. Fresh outbreaks of
disorder began about 3pm, and in
the Clifton Street district, where
yesterday the caretaker of the
Orange Hall was shot dead, the
military had to make a charge with
fixed bayonets to clear a crowd,
which was regarded as menacing.
Firing first broke out in Stanhope
Street, where concealed snipers
became active. The military, who
throughout the day have been
strongly posted in the disturbed
areas, returned the fire, but had
difficulty in locating the gunmen.
Half an hour later threatening
crowds had collected, and the
soldiers again opened fire.
Eventually a bayonet charge was
ordered, and the streets were
cleared. One civilian was wounded.
Two of the civilians kidnapped in
the border raids last week — Mr
John Anderson, veterinary surgeon,
of Ards, Caledon, and Mr Joseph
MacManus, stationmaster at
Emyvale Road Station, of the
Clogher Valley Railway — have been
released and are now back in their
homes, but there is no news yet of
the release of any of the special
constables. Mr Churchill’s statement
that 15 of the prisoners are to be set
free has only slightly relaxed the
tension here and the Government
will be pressed to secure the freedom
of all who were taken south after the
raids. The border is now very
strongly guarded. At least 10,000 A
and B specials are watching the line,
and British troops are available to
assist if this should become
necessary. There has been no clash
with the IRA since the tragedy at
Clones. Special constables are being
moved only within the territory of
the Northern Government and
considerable use is being made of
motor transport.