2
2
28
6
43
‐175%
‐150%
‐125%
‐100%
‐75%
‐50%
‐25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
Relative difference with recycling according
to the number of cases
>150%
<‐150%
alternative
preferred to
recycling
recycling
preferred to
alternative Depletion^ of^ abiotic^ resources
Incineration with
energy recovery
Landfill Pyrolysis
Figure 15 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. recycling for depletion of natural resources for plastics.
The size of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.
9
2
24
1
2
1
6
‐175%
‐150%
‐125%
‐100%
‐75%
‐50%
‐25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
Relative difference with incineration with energy recovery
according to the number of cases
>150%
<‐150%
incineration with
energy recovery
preferred to
alternative
alternative preferred
to incineration with
energy recovery
Depletion of abiotic resources
Recycling Landfill Pyrolysis
Figure 16 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. incineration for depletion of natural resources for
plastics. The size of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.