2
2
2
1
4
2
31
12
4 4
2 1
‐175%
‐150%
‐125%
‐100%
‐75%
‐50%
‐25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
Relative difference with recycling according
to the number of cases
>150
%
<‐ 150
%
>150%
<‐150%
recycling
preferred to
alternative
alternative
preferred to
recycling
Incineration
with energy
recovery
Landfill Pyrolysis
Energy demand
Figure 17 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. recycling for energy demand for plastics. The size of
the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.
6
1
14
4
3
1
2
1
9
4
1
‐175%
‐150%
‐125%
‐100%
‐75%
‐50%
‐25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
Relative difference with incineration with energy recovery
according to the number of cases
>150
%
<‐ 150
%
>150%
<‐150%
incineration with
energy recovery
preferred to
alternative
alternative
preferred to
incineration with
energy recovery
Recycling Landfill Pyrolysis
Energy demand
Figure 18 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. incineration with energy recovery for energy demand
for plastics. The size of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.