1325‐175%‐150%‐125%‐100%‐75%‐50%‐25%0%25%50%75%100%125%150%175%Relative difference with composting according
to the number of cases>150%<‐150%
alternative
preferred to
compostingcomposting
preferred to
alternative Depletion^ of^ abiotic^ resourcesRecycling Incineration with
energy recoveryLandfillFigure 27 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. composting for depletion of natural resources for
biopolymers. The size of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.
12233‐175%‐150%‐125%‐100%‐75%‐50%‐25%0%25%50%75%100%125%150%175%Relative difference with incineration with energy recovery
according to the number of cases>150%<‐150%incineration with
energy recovery
preferred to
alternativealternative preferred to
incineration with
energy recoveryDepletion of abiotic resourcesRecycling Composting LandfillFigure 28 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. incineration for depletion of natural resources for
biopolymers. The size of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.