13
25
‐175%
‐150%
‐125%
‐100%
‐75%
‐50%
‐25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
Relative difference with composting according
to the number of cases
>150%
<‐150%
alternative
preferred to
composting
composting
preferred to
alternative Depletion^ of^ abiotic^ resources
Recycling Incineration with
energy recovery
Landfill
Figure 27 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. composting for depletion of natural resources for
biopolymers. The size of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.
1
22
33
‐175%
‐150%
‐125%
‐100%
‐75%
‐50%
‐25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
Relative difference with incineration with energy recovery
according to the number of cases
>150%
<‐150%
incineration with
energy recovery
preferred to
alternative
alternative preferred to
incineration with
energy recovery
Depletion of abiotic resources
Recycling Composting Landfill
Figure 28 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. incineration for depletion of natural resources for
biopolymers. The size of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.