The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor (W W Norton & Company; 1998)

(Nora) #1
NOTES^551


  1. Krout and Fox, The Completion of Independence, pp. 53-57.

  2. Fish, Rise of the Common Man, p. 130. It should be noted that not everyone
    agreed with this general encouragement to westward settlement. The older states were
    opposed on the ground that such generous terms would encourage their inhabitants
    to emigrate, which they did in fact. And the slave states were upset by a policy that gave
    no special consideration to slaveowners: their allotments would be no larger than those
    of nonslaveowners. The aim was to promote homesteads, not plantations.

  3. Fish, Rise of the Common Man, p. 118.

  4. R. Cortés Conde, "The Growth of the Argentine Economy," in Bethell, ed., Ar­
    gentina Since Independence, p. 75.

  5. Bethell, ed., Argentina, p. 55. One indicator of the difference between the Amer­
    ican sense of identity and purpose as against the Argentine is that the United States
    conducted national censuses every decade from the founding of the republic, whereas
    Argentina did not do its first national census until 1869, the second in 1895—ibid.,
    p. 54.

  6. The primary source for these figures is Rock, Argentina 1516-1987, pp. 141-45,
    164-67.

  7. The figures come from Historical Statistics of the United States, Series A and C.

  8. Ibid., series C 115-32.

  9. Rock, Argentina, 1516-1987, p. 89.

  10. Juan B. Justo, Internacionalismoypatria (Buenos Aires, 1933), cited in Cornblit,
    "European Immigrants," p. 233.

  11. Even the most efficient farmers working the most fertile soil found (find) their
    profits vanishing in the form of lower prices. The gains went (go) largely to the cus­
    tomers. Erik Reinert, "Symptoms and Causes of Poverty," stresses the contrast be­
    tween this "classical" pattern of distribution of gains from technological change, which
    he sees as especially typical of agriculture and distribution, and the "collusive" pattern
    of industries that are marked by barriers to entry and increasing returns to knowledge.
    He uses the term collusive because "the forces of the producing country (capital,
    labour, and government) in practice—although not as a conspiracy—'collude' to ap­
    propriate these gains" (p. 84).

  12. Landes, Revolution in Time, p. 326.

  13. Shumway, Invention of Argentina, p. 156, n. 3.

  14. Rock, Argentina, 1516-1987, p. 233.

  15. Cortés Conde, Corrientes immigratorias; Cornblit, "European Immigrants," p.

  16. In the early censuses, about a tenth of the so-called industrial establishments
    were what we would call services: shoe repair shops, photography studios, seamstresses'
    shops, barber shops, and hairdressing parlors—all the necessary paraphernalia of urban
    life. The 1935 census dropped them from the industrial sector—Lewis, Crisis of Ar­
    gentine Capitalism, p. 35.

  17. Lewis, Crisis, ch. 6: "Labor." The quotation that follows is from p. 103.

  18. See ibid., p. 492.

  19. Pedro de Azevedo, cited in Freyre, The Masters and the Slaves, p. 41.

  20. Batou, Cent ans, ch. 8: "L'essor économique du Paraguay."

  21. On this so-called revisionist school, see Pastore, "State-led Industrialisation," who
    cites, among others, Whigham, "The Iron Works of Ybycui"; a manuscript by Vera
    Blinn Reber, "Modernization from Within: Trade and Development in Paraguay,
    1810-1870" (Shippensburg Univ., Carlisle, PA, 1990); and Batou, Cent ans, who
    sees this as one more example of a much wider pattern of European hostility to "Third
    World" (anachronism) initiatives. For a similar revisionist approach to Argentine his­
    tory, Pastore cites Tulio Halperin Donghi, El revisionismo historico argentino (Buenos
    Aires, 1970).

Free download pdf