Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers

(Chris Devlin) #1
218 CHAPTER 6 RANDOM SAMPLING AND DATA DESCRIPTION

Trial 3 sistent with respect to the variability of the measurements?
Are all five trials centered on the same value? How does each
group of trials compare to the true value? Could there have
been “startup” effects in the experiment that Michelson
performed? Could there have been bias in the measuring
instrument?
6-86. In 1789, Henry Cavendish estimated the density of
the earth by using a torsion balance. His 29 measurements
follow, expressed as a multiple of the density of water.

5.50
5.55
5.57
5.34
5.42

5.30
5.61
5.36
5.53
5.79

5.47
5.75
4.88
5.29
5.62

5.10
5.63
5.86
4.07
5.58

5.29
5.27
5.34
5.85
5.26

5.65
5.44
5.39
5.46

880
880
880
910

880
850
860
870

720
840
720
840

620
850
860
840

970
840
950
840

Trial 4
890
910
810
920

810
890
820
860

800
880
770
720

760
840
740
850

750
850
760
780
Trial 5
890
870
840
870

780
810
810
740

760
810
810
940

790
950
810
800

820
810
850
870
The currently accepted true velocity of light in a vacuum is
299, 792.5 kilometers per second. Stigler (1977, The Annals of
Statistics) reports that the “true” value for comparison to these
measurements is 734.5. Construct comparative box plots of
these measurements. Does it seem that all five trials are con-

(a) Calculate the sample mean, sample standard deviation,
and median of the Cavendish density data.
(b) Construct a normal probability plot of the data. Comment
on the plot. Does there seem to be a “low” outlier in the
data?
(c) Would the sample median be a better estimate of the
density of the earth than the sample mean? Why?

c 06 .qxd 5/14/02 9:57 M Page 218 RK UL 6 RK UL 6:Desktop Folder:TEMP WORK:MONTGOMERY:REVISES UPLO D CH114 FIN L:Quark Files:

Free download pdf