in many practical situations we would not be as concerned with making a type II error if the mean
were “close” to the hypothesized value. We would be much more interested in detecting large
differences between the true mean and the value specified in the null hypothesis.
The type II error probability also depends on the sample size n. Suppose that the null
hypothesis is centimeters per second and that the true value of the mean is
If the sample size is increased from n10 to n16, the situation of Fig. 9-5 results.
The normal distribution on the left is the distribution of when the mean , and the
normal distribution on the right is the distribution of when. As shown in Fig. 9-5,
the type II error probability isWhen , the standard deviation of is , and the z-values
corresponding to 48.5 and 51.5 when areTherefore0.2119 0.00000.2119Recall that when and , we found that ; therefore, increasing the
sample size results in a decrease in the probability of type II error.
The results from this section and a few other similar calculations are summarized in the
following table:n 10 52 0.2643P 1
5.60Z
0.80 2 P 1 Z
0.80 2
P 1 Z
5.60 2z 1 48.5
52
0.6255.60 and z 2
51.5
52
0.625
0.80 52n 16 X
1 n2.5
116 0.625
P 1 48.5X51.5 when 522X 52X 5052.H 0 : 50284 CHAPTER 9 TESTS OF HYPOTHESES FOR A SINGLE SAMPLEAcceptance Sample
Region Size at 52 at 50.510 0.0576 0.2643 0.8923
10 0.0114 0.5000 0.9705
16 0.0164 0.2119 0.9445
48 x 52 16 0.0014 0.5000 0.991848.5x51.548 x 5248.5x51.5460.60.80.40.20
48 50 52 54 56Under H 0 : = 50 Under H 1 : = 52Probability densityμ μx–Figure 9-5 The
probability of type II
error when
and n16. 52c 09 .qxd 5/15/02 8:02 PM Page 284 RK UL 9 RK UL 9:Desktop Folder: