14-7 2kFACTORIAL DESIGNS 527The numerical estimates of the effects indicate that the effect of deposition time is large and
has a positive direction (increasing deposition time increases thickness), since changing dep-
osition time from low to high changes the mean epitaxial layer thickness by 0.836 m. The
effects of arsenic flow rate (B) and the ABinteraction appear small.
The importance of these effects may be confirmed with the analysis of variance. The
sums of squares for A, B, and ABare computed as follows:3.0672The analysis of variance is summarized in Table 14-14 and confirms our conclusions obtained
by examining the magnitude and direction of the effects. Deposition time is the only factor
that significantly affects epitaxial layer thickness, and from the direction of the effect esti-
mates we know that longer deposition times lead to thicker epitaxial layers.Residual Analysis
It is easy to obtain the residuals from a 2kdesign by fitting a regression modelto the data. For
the epitaxial process experiment, the regression model isY 0 1 x 1 SST14.037^2 p14.932^2 1 56.081p59.156 22
16SSAB3 ab 112 ab 42
163 0.252 42
160.0040SSB3 baba 11242
163 0.538 42
160.0181SSA3 aabb 11242
16
3 6.688 42
16
2.7956Table 14-13 The 2^2 Design for the Epitaxial Process ExperimentTreatment Design Factors Thickness (m)
Combination AB AB Thickness (m) Total Average
112 14.037 14.165 13.972 13.907 56.081 14.020
a 14.821 14.757 14.843 14.878 59.299 14.825
b 13.880 13.860 14.032 13.914 55.686 13.922
ab 14.888 14.921 14.415 14.932 59.156 14.789Table 14-14 Analysis of Variance for the Epitaxial Process ExperimentSource of Degrees of
Variation Sum of Squares Freedom Mean Square f 0 P-Value
A(deposition time) 2.7956 1 2.7956 134.40 7.07 E-8
B(arsenic flow) 0.0181 1 0.0181 0.87 0.38
AB 0.0040 1 0.0040 0.19 0.67
Error 0.2495 12 0.0208
Total 3.0672 15c 14 .qxd 5/9/02 7:54 PM Page 527 RK UL 6 RK UL 6:Desktop Folder:TEMP WORK:MONTGOMERY:REVISES UPLO D CH112 FIN L: