radicalism of the 1930s should tempt us to look again at what has been
stereotyped as an inauthentic, mimetic nineteenth century.^19
If Dash’s argument can reframe the study of Firmin’s late nineteenth-century letters from
exile, then criticisms of nineteenth-century Haitian poetry should certainly be challenged within
this same framework. One century of writing, or one genre of writing, does not have to claim
value at the expense of a previous period or other literary mode. If studies prompted by the 2004
bicentennial can demonstrate that Haitians did not merely imitate but ultimately transformed the
universal idea of freedom through their own revolution, then surely the same claims could apply
to the literature which followed. On this point, Nick Nesbitt convincingly demonstrates that as
the greatest political event of the age of Enlightenment, the Haitian Revolution was by no means
a passive acquiescence to the Declarations of the Rights of Man, never intended to encompass
the total and sudden abolition of slavery and certainly not the formation of a state lead by black
and mulatto leaders.^20 Similarly, that blacks and mulattos in nineteenth-century Haiti would
author poetry in French, assert poetic subjectivity, and claim their own modern history
constituted radically unexpected gestures in the global environment hostile to Haiti’s
articulations of nationhood. Moreover, Haiti’s Romantic poetry displays the awareness Haitian
writers had about the stakes involved in their own ideas of nation and notably of the fragility of
these ambitions. This dissertation demonstrates that mere imitation thus constitutes an
impossible label to characterize the first century of Haitian literature and with which to approach
the complexities of Haitian poetry. Contrary to previous assessments, I argue that Haitian poetry
(^19) J. Michael Dash, “Nineteenth-Century Haiti and the Archipelago of the Americas: Anténor Firmin’s Letter From
St. Thomas,” Research in African Literatures 35.2 (2004): 46.
(^20) Nick Nesbitt, “The Idea of 1804,” Yale French Studies 107 (2005): 17-19. Similar compelling arguments along
these lines are also made by Hilary McD. Beckles in “Capitalism, Slavery and Caribbean Modernity,” Callaloo 20.
(1998) 777-789.