users will move to a local government admin-
istration that optimizes their tax and services
preferences, trading off the costs of paying
for public services through taxation against
sacrifices in their ability to consume private
services. The model has been used to explore
the geographical consequences of distributed
and competitive local government administra-
tive structures (e.g. Davies, 1982). The process
also operates at an international level, and
underlies the creation of offshore financial
centres, tax havens and export processing
zones, all of which attract international capital
investmentpartly through fiscal incentives that
include tax holidays and other inducements.al
fla^neur/fla^nerie The flaˆneur is associated
with aimless urban wandering and observing,
especially in nineteenth-century Paris, where it
took its first steps. Yet the figure has also
walked further afield, as it has been taken
up more widely in social, cultural and urban
studies as ‘an emblematic representative of
modernity and the personification of con-
temporary urbanity’ (Ferguson, 1994, p. 22).
Despite becoming a common motif, the
flaˆneurand activities offlaˆnerieremain elusive
and resist easy definition, although they
usually involve a solitary and anonymous
male, with the emphasis falling variously on
strolling, idling, watching, writing, artistic cre-
ativity and detection. Many commentators
suggest that it is most productively seen as a
mythological figure, a strategy ofrepresenta-
tion, and thus asocial constructionwithin
discourse more than a sociological reality.
First referenced in 1806, the flaˆneur
received its most famous articulation in the
writings of Charles Baudelaire, for whom it
was a ‘modern hero’ and passionate spectator
who derived poetic meaning from an immer-
sion in thecity, in the fleeting movement and
electrical charge of its crowd. Baudelaire’s
account played an important role in Walter
Benjamin’s investigations of Paris as ‘capital
of the nineteenth century’, and in his attempts
to decipher the phantasmagorias of urban
modernity. In these texts, the increasing com-
modification and rationalization of the city
along with the decline of the arcades meant
that theflaˆneurwas already becoming a dis-
placed and bygone figure. Benjamin’s writings
have remained a key source for subsequent
interest in theflaˆneur, with some critics view-
ing Benjamin’s own approach as being akin
toflaˆneriein its mode of reading metropolitan
spaces through attending to urban fragments
and signs. There have also been multiple
reinventions offlaˆnerie in the arts, cultural
practice and urban studies through recent
interest in other forms of urban walking (see
urban exploration).
Feminist critics have emphasized the exclu-
sivity offlaˆnerie, arguing that a female equiva-
lent – theflaˆneuse– was rendered impossible
by the ideologies and sexual divisions of nine-
teenth- and early-twentieth-century cities that
constrained anonymous and unaccompanied
movement by women. The practice offlaˆnerie
itself, so it is argued, was structured around a
male gaze. However, critical elaborations have
since questioned the extent of the exclusion of
women from the public realm, revealing the
intersections between public and private, and
have also argued that theflaˆneurwas a more
insecure and marginal figure than is often sup-
posed (Wilson, 1991). Writers have further
traced out the possibilities for femaleflaˆnerie
through the development of department
stores, through writing and literary texts and
through early cinema, which enabled a mobile
urban gaze from within the safety and respect-
ability of afilmaudience.
Suchstudieshaveled to re-evaluations of
the (in)visibility of theflaˆneuse(D’Souza and
McDonough, 2006). Dissenting voices never-
theless remain, with Janet Wolff arguing that
the problem with theflaˆneurlies less in its
exclusivity than in the centrality it has been
accorded in urban and cultural studies of
modernity, and in the consequent occlusion
of female experiences. She therefore calls
for theflaˆneur’s ‘retirement’ from centre stage
and for attention to turn instead to the ‘micro-
practices of urban living, and the very specific
ways in which women negotiate the modern
city’. In the process, she claims, questions
of femaleflaˆnerielose importance and ‘women
become entirely visible in their own particular
practices and experiences’ (Wolff, 2006,
p. 28). dp
Suggested reading
D’Souza and McDonough (2006); Tester (1994).
flexible accumulation Aregime of accu-
mulationemphasizing diversity and differen-
tiation rather than the standardization
associated with Fordist modes (seefordism)
of accumulation. Flexible accumulation
requires workers, machinery and manufactur-
ing techniques that can quickly and regularly
innovate and adapt to changes in consumer
tastes, thus generating profit throughecon-
omies of scoperather than theeconomies
of scale. As Harvey (1999 [1982]) points
FLAˆNEUR/FLAˆNERIE
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_F Final Proof page 256 31.3.2009 1:20pm