Comp. by: VPugazhenthi Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_N Date:31/
3/09 Time:15:13:07 Filepath:H:/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-9781405132879/appln/
3B2/revises/9781405132879_4_N.3d
their different main constituents/actors, types
of relation foregrounded and methods of
analysis:
(1) Infrastructural technically based net-
works, such as electrical, road, rail, sew-
erage and telecommunications systems,
can be described according to their
density, connectedness and orientation
(Haggett, 1969: seeinfrastructure).
(2) social networks, such as kinship,
friendship and communities, have histor-
ically been analysed both quantitatively
by social network analysis and more
qualitatively using tools derived from
social anthropology (Strathern, 1996).
(3) Network-based models of organization
have tended to merge the distinctive fea-
tures of the previous two approaches, as
the nature of collectives from the infor-
mal and local to formal and global are
increasingly seen as exhibiting this kind
of form (Castells, 1996b; Barry, 2001).
(4) Finally, actor-networks (Latour, 1993)
are the distributed forms of agency that
emerge from articulation of humans and
non-humans as seen by practitioners of
the conceptual approach that originated
in science and technology studies
(STS) and is known asactor-network
theory. nb
neural networks Methods of finding solu-
tions to a range of technical problems using
computeralgorithmsbased on models of the
human brain. The networks are ‘trained’ to
find solutions to new problems by being
given exemplars on which to base their de-
cisions, such as which category to assign an
individual observation to when the category
boundaries are fuzzy (cf.fuzzy sets). The
approach is particularly valuable in various
forms of pattern recognition and classification
and is widely used inremote sensingstudies
for classifying segments of the Earth’s surface
according to theirland cover(Foody, 1996).
The spectral signatures of different land-cover
types vary, and many small areas for which
data are obtained contain a mixture of types.
The goal is to allocate each observation unit
(pixel) to a relatively homogeneous category.
‘Training’ sites are defined, using synthetic
pixels with homogeneous land cover, and the
neural network algorithm, through an iterative
procedure, allocates all of the observed pixels
to the type it most closely resembles. It is then
possible to estimate the proportion of the land
surface under different types of cover.
A similar approach has been suggested for
classificationof socio-economic data. Very
few small areas – such ascensus tracts– are
homogeneous in their population character-
istics so clear boundaries between types of
area cannot be defineda priorion other than
pragmatic grounds (e.g. use of quartiles); they
are the same as pixels with mixed land
uses. Using neural network approaches,
ideal typesare defined (with different levels
of homogeneity and mixtures, for example)
and the individual tracts are allocated to
those they most resemble (Mitchell, Martin
and Foody, 1998). rj
Suggested reading
Openshaw and Openshaw (1997).
New Economic Geography An approach as-
sociated primarily with a group of American
neo-classical economists (seeneo-classical
economics) who from the early 1990s sought
to apply theoretical rigour, analytical methods
and econometric (statistical) techniques to a
space-economy. Such interest was surprising,
given economists’ historical attachment to
an a-spatialeconomy, to ‘a wonderland of
no dimensions’ (Isard, 1956, p. 25). For Paul
Krugman (1995a, p. 33), however, the econo-
mist most central to the movement, the New
Economic Geography was ‘a vision on the road
to Damascus’: ‘I suddenly realised that I had
spent my whole professional life .. .thinking
and writing about economic geography, with-
out being aware of it’ (Krugman, 1991, p. 1).
Krugman’s epiphany was that the analytical
framework he previously deployed to under-
stand internationaltradewas perfect for com-
prehending economic geography: ‘Economic
geography, like .. .trade theory, is largely
about increasing returns and multiple equilib-
ria. The technical tricks needed to make
models tractable are often the same’
(Krugman, 1995b, p. 41). That term ‘model’
is critical. While conventional economic geog-
raphy was ‘a field full of empirical insights,
good stories and obvious practical import-
ance’, it was ‘neglected’ – that is, neglected
by economists – ‘because nobody had seen a
good way to formalize it’ (Krugman, 1995b,
p. 41). Krugman’s project was to take works of
economic geographers and to make them (as
he saw it) intellectually viable by expressing
them in the formal vocabulary of economic
models. As he writes, ‘we will integrate
spatial issues into economics through clever
models .. .that make sense of the insights of
the geographers in a way that meets the formal
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_N Final Proof page 499 31.3.2009 3:13pm Compositor Name: ARaju
NEW ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY