The Dictionary of Human Geography

(nextflipdebug2) #1

Comp. by: LElumalai Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_P Date:1/4/09
Time:15:20:44 Filepath:H:/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-9781405132879/appln/3B2/re-
vises/9781405132879_4_P.3d


P


Pacific Rim A geographicalregionstretching
across the Pacific Ocean and incorporating the
westernmost cities of North America in add-
ition to Japan, Australia, and the coastal cities
and city-states of East Asia. The term became
prominent in the 1980s as a result of Asia’s
increased economic power and the intensifica-
tion of cross-Pacifictradeand financial link-
ages (Appelbaum and Henderson, 1992).
Academic and popular writings on the region
became so saturated with hyperbole that many
critics began to argue that the region was
itself a literary creation – one that served the
economic agendas andgeopolitical visions
of a pro-laissez-faireEuro-American audience
(see, e.g., Dirlik, 1993). km

Suggested reading
Appelbaum and Henderson (1992); Dirlik (1993).

pandemic A term (derived from the Greek
pan-, allþdemos, people), used in the health
sciences to describe the occurrence of a speci-
fied illness, health behaviour or other health-
related event that is unusually prevalent
(epidemic) over an extensive geographical
area. The term is often applied to periods
associated with the international spread of
major human infectiousdiseasessuch as chol-
era, influenza, plague and smallpox (e.g. ‘pan-
demic influenza’; see Patterson, 1986), with
the expression ‘global pandemic’ reserved for
periods of rapid worldwide transmission of a
disease agent. Global pandemic events of the
past 100 years include ‘Spanish’ influenza
(1918–19), El Tor cholera (1961– ) and the
Acquired ImmunoDeficiency Syndrome
(AIDS) (1981– ); see Kohn (1998). (See also
biosecurity.) msr

Suggested reading
Cliff, Haggett and Smallman-Raynor (2004).

Panopticon Philosopher and jurist Jeremy
Bentham’s design for a building, most com-
monly aprison, in which centralized power is
all-seeing –pan-opticon– is described in his
book of that title (1791; see Bentham, 1995).
Bentham’s design was for a circular building,
with rooms arranged around the circumfer-
ence, open at both ends, of one or more

storeys. The individual rooms, or cells, would
thus be illuminated from behind, and visible at
the front to a central tower. The occupant of
the tower would thus be able to look into each
and every cell from a fixed position. However,
it would be possible to construct a system of
blinds that prevented the occupants of the
cells from seeing into the control tower, and
so they would be unaware if they were being
observed at that point or not, or even if there
was an occupant in the tower. Not only would
they therefore be subject to external power,
they would turn that power on to themselves,
being self-disciplining. Bentham’s design was
suitable for any building in which it was neces-
sary or useful to be able to continually observe
individuals who would have no contact with
the other occupants, such as a school, a fac-
tory, a hospital, barracks, a poor-house or,
most commonly, a prison. Bentham’s design
was offered to the British government as a
model for the prisons being constructed as
transportation to the colonies became less
viable in the late eighteenth and early nine-
teenth centuries, but was only taken up in part
in model prisons such as Pentonville and the
Millbank Penitentiary. Panopticons were also
built outside Britain, including in Spain, the
Netherlands, the USA and Cuba.
Bentham’s model assumed a wider contem-
porary significance as a result of Foucault’s
1976a [1975] analysis of the Panopticon as
an exemplar of disciplinary power (see
Patton, 1979). Foucault saw the Panopticon
as the architectural conjunction of two models
of dealing with social problems, which he ana-
lysed as the problem of lepers and the problem
of the plague. With leprosy, victims were
excluded fromsociety; with the plague, they
were rigidly controlled from within. While ‘the
leper gave rise to rituals of exclusion ... the
plague gave rise to disciplinary diagrams’. In a
plague town there was a strict spatial partition-
ing, with careful surveillance, detailed
inspection and mechanisms of ordering.
These illustrate two models: a pure commu-
nity as opposed to a disciplined society. Both
are symbols of wider models ofpower,asis
the Panopticon in Foucault’s analysis. It is
the architectural fusion of these models, where
the organization of the plague town is brought

Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_P Final Proof page 517 1.4.2009 3:20pm
Free download pdf