The Dictionary of Human Geography

(nextflipdebug2) #1

Comp. by: VPugazhenthi Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_Q Date:31/
3/09 Time:19:14:08 Filepath:H:/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-9781405132879/appln/
3B2/revises/9781405132879_4_Q.3d


of resistance to masculinist community
norms. Her research thus generated a practice
ofresistancethat could not be made public,
at least at the research site. Pratt (2004,
p. 193) has urged that we consider the re-
search process itself as an important research
outcome: ‘We might think of it as a space ...
from which to speak and perform the unspeak-
able ... The written traces, for example [aca-
demic] text, are but one outcome of a process
that far exceeds them.’ Writing and other
forms of representation (such as video or pho-
tography) can be a significant part of the ac-
tual research process in qualitative research;
representation is a means of doing the re-
search, of making creative connections and
developing interpretations. Different ways of
understanding can be communicated through
differentmedia(Berg and Mansvelt, 2000).
Despite the widespread use of qualitative
data, some scepticism remains about the cred-
ibility of qualitative data. Baxter and Eyles
(1997) are concerned that qualitative geog-
raphers often have not been sufficiently trans-
parent about their methodology. There is a
danger of ‘mining’ qualitative interviews for
enticing quotes that selectively advance the
researcher’s interpretation, and of presenting
de-contextualized snippets of conversation.
There is also a risk of stereotyping respondents
by reading across interview transcripts to iden-
tify common themes rather than studying the
contradictions and complexity within individ-
ual interviews. There are many different strat-
egies for analysing qualitative data (there are
43, according to Crang, 2005). Crang (2005)
distinguishes three broad approaches: devel-
oping grounded theory, analysing the formal
structure of the text or transcript or image, or
reading qualitative data as narrative. McDo-
well (1998) describes a process of repeatedly
reading her transcript data, first for plot and
then for representations of ‘self’ (also, for a
strategy for analysing narrative genres, see
Chari, 2003). One characteristic of the best
qualitative research is the immense volume of
data collected, and although there is no sub-
stitute for examining the data closely and
repeatedly, a number of computer software
packages are available to systematize tran-
script data and to assist in coding it (Peace,
2000).
Although qualitative methods have often
been conceived as opposite or even opposed
to quantitative methods, this is an unproduct-
ive way of conceiving the distinction. Critical
realismwas one important moment for think-
ing of the two approaches as compatible:

extensive methods (often quantitative) were
seen to be especially useful for describing pat-
terns, and intensive methods (typically quali-
tative ones) more effective for studying causal
processes (cf.extensive research;intensive
research). More recently, the call of mixed
methods has been tied to the concept of tri-
angulation, which involves exploring processes
from different angles using different methods,
in order to assess the validity of each data
source and method, and more fully under-
stand the process. Nightingale (2003) links
the utility of mixed methods to the concept
of situated knowledge: she suggests that a
mix of qualitative and quantitative methods
allows the researcher to better understand
the limits of knowledge acquired through
any one methodological approach. Different
approaches resonate with different audiences


  • for instance, state funding bodies and policy-
    makers are typically more convinced of the
    ‘scientific merit’ of quantitative techniques,
    which they sometimes designate as ‘evidence-
    based’ research (Mountz, Miyares, Wright
    and Bailey, 2003). Blending qualitative and
    quantitative methods may allow a researcher
    to reach different audiences in more authori-
    tative ways. gp


Suggested reading
Hay (2000); Limb and Dwyer (2001).

quality of life A concept linked to that of
social well-being, which is based on the ar-
gument that the human condition should be
evaluated on a wider range of indicators than
just income – whether at the individual level or
through national aggregates (such asgross
national product and gross domestic
product). Work on the quality of life was
introduced to geographers in the 1970s in
studies of territorial social indicators (Smith,
1973; Knox, 1975), which focused on separ-
ate dimensions of collective well-being, such
as income, wealth and employment, the built
environment, physical and mental health, edu-
cation, social disorganization, social belong-
ing, and recreation and leisure.mapsof these
indicators, at a variety of spatialscalesfrom
the international to the inter-urban, provided
evidence on geographical variations in well-
being, with which researchers could address
the question of ‘who gets what, where?’
(Smith, 1977).
Other concepts, such as freedom (cf.
human rights) and happiness, are frequently
related to measures of the quality of life that
individuals and societies experience, although

Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_Q Final Proof page 606 31.3.2009 7:14pm Compositor Name: ARaju

QUALITY OF LIFE
Free download pdf