The Dictionary of Human Geography

(nextflipdebug2) #1

Comp. by: LElumalai Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_R Date:2/4/09
Time:21:12:30 Filepath:H:/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-9781405132879/appln/3B2/re-
vises/9781405132879_4_R-new.3d


Debates about political resistance crystallize
key trends incritical human geography.
marxist geographyhas a long tradition of
studying collective organizing and everyday
resistance toclassexploitation; and struggle
against patriarchy is well articulated in
feminist geographies. The geographical
embeddedness of political and cultural action
has been explored in work onsocial move-
ments, highlighting: how particularities of
placeinfluence the emergence, character and
strategy of movements (Routledge, 1993);
what geographical dilemmas labour unions
face in the age of global capital (Herod,
1998: and seelabour geography); and the
importance of social movements in shaping
political and social geographies (Miller,
2000).
An interest incultural politicsand the
persuit of thecultural turnled to two devel-
opments in the geographical study of resis-
tance. First, the interpretative frame was
enlarged to include myriad everyday symbolic
and material practices, which contested not
only class exploitation but also gender, racial,
sexual (and other) forms of domination and
oppression. James Scott’sWeapons of the weak
(1985) was a key text, in which he identified
foot dragging, desertion, false compliance, pil-
fering, feigned ignorance, arson, sabotage and
more as ‘everyday resistance’. These practices
required little or no coordination or planning,
made use of implicit understandings and
informal networks, and typically avoided any
direct or symbolic confrontation with author-
ity (1985, p. xvi). However, when almost every
action is conceptualized as resistance, critical
distinctions between effective and ineffective
political resistance, and commitments to col-
lective organizing and the coordination across
different forms of domination, may be lost
(Pile and Keith, 1997).
Second, resistant subjects were understood
as authoring their politicalidentitiesin rela-
tion to multiple axes ofpower, and dominant
structures, discourses and actors within soci-
ety (Castells, 1997). Identity formation is
thus complex in terms of both the multiplici-
ties of identities negotiated by each indivi-
dual and thehybridityof resultant resistance
practices (seethird space; Pile and Keith,
1997). Concerns with the latter have been
influenced by Foucault’s (1990 [1976]) version
ofpost-structuralism, which views power as
insinuated throughout all social activity, inher-
ent in practically all social and political relation-
ships. The operations of power, domination
and resistance are seen as integrally rolled up

in articulations of society andspace, resulting
in the entanglement of resisting and dominat-
ing practices; for example, through the creation
of internal hierarchies, the silencing of dissent,
or how various forces ofhegemonyare intern-
alized and reproduced within resistance prac-
tices (Sharp et al., 2000).
With the intensity of the processes ofneo-
liberal globalization, concerns over the
ways in which the production ofscaleis itself
an outcome of political struggle (Smith, 1993)
are now turning to networked forms of politics
and resistance (Grewal and Kaplan, 1994;
Featherstone, 2003, 2005b; Routledge 2003;
Massey, 2004). This challenges the way in
which resistance has been previously theorized
through bounded versions of space andplace,
and is crucial for engaging with the dynamic
transnational networks of opposition to glob-
alization (see anti-globalization; trans-
nationalism). pr

resort life-cycle model Originally devel-
oped by Butler (1980) (see figure), the tourist
resort life-cyclemodeldepicts an almost inev-
itable pattern of development in five phases.
First, there is a phase ofexplorationcharacter-
ized by small numbers of relatively wealthy
tourists ‘finding’ the destination. Second,
local capital and populations becomeinvolved
in developing the resort. Third, there isdevel-
opment as agglomeration effects lead to
increasing returns. Thus as visitor and busi-
ness numbers increase, the knowledge and
skill base expands. More visitors mean more
capital, which means more investment in
facilities and accessibility, which makes the
destination more attractive, and so on. This
develops into a fourth phase ofconsolidation,
where competition among increasing numbers
of providers to gain large volumes of tourists

Stagnation

Consolidation Decline

Rejuvenation

Development

Involvement

Time

Number of tourists

Exploration

resort life-cycle model (from Butler, 1980)

Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_R-new Final Proof page 647 2.4.2009 9:12pm

RESORT LIFE-CYCLE MODEL
Free download pdf