Comp. by: LElumalai Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_T Date:31/3/09
Time:21:40:50 Filepath://ppdys1108/BlackwellCup/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-
9781405132879/appln/3B2/revises/9781405132879_4_T.3d
territorial integrity A term in international
lawand, increasingly,critical geopolitics,
that has two main meanings:territorial preser-
vationandterritorial sovereignty. Its meaning of
territorial preservation establishes a right to
the preservation of astate’s existingbound-
aries, and preventssecessionor territorial
conquest by other states. Territorial sover-
eignty or inviolability allows a state to exercise
its power within those boundaries, without
intervention or prohibition from external act-
ors (see Akweenda, 1989). Both senses of the
term are enshrined and protected by key
clauses of Article 2 of the founding Charter
of the United Nations.
While there is an element of necessary fic-
tion in the idea that states are in control of,
and therefore exercisesovereigntyover, their
entireterritory, this has provided a frame-
work within which international law has oper-
ated. The norm of territorial preservation
conditioneddecolonizationinafrica, and
helped to frame the international context of
the break-up of the Soviet Union. Territorial
sovereignty has been held as a guiding prin-
ciple of the international system where, for
actions that do not have an effect beyond its
borders, a state has been held to be sovereign.
This is what the European Union callsinternal
competence. Thus international law is built
around three core principles: sovereign equal-
ity of all states; internal competence for do-
mestic jurisdiction; and territorial preservation
of existing boundaries. What this means is that
any challenge to the ‘monopoly of legitimate
physical violence’ that states are held to have
within their territory is necessarily a challenge
to territorial integrity by infringing on the spa-
tial extent of their sovereignty.
Territorial integrity in the sense of territorial
sovereignty has come under increased pressure
in recent years, with humanitarian intervention
or the ‘responsibility to protect’ civilian popu-
lations legitimating external intervention in in-
ternal jurisdiction. The doctrine of ‘contingent
sovereignty’ promoted by the Bush administra-
tion in the ‘war on terror’ (Elden, 2006: see also
terrorism;war) held that state sovereignty
is dependent on adherence to codes of behav-
iour – notably not harbouring terrorists
or pursuing ‘weapons of mass destruction’ –
and violation of these norms legitimates
pre-emptive action (Elden, 2005, 2007a,c).
Yet at the same time territorial preservation
has been held as a dominant organizing prin-
ciple, with a widespread reluctance to support
independence secession movements or rethink
the boundaries of existing states. se
Suggested reading
Elden (2005); Zacher (2001).
territorial justice The territorialization of
the principles ofsocial justice. This involves
examining the conditions under which wealth
andsocial well-beingare produced, distrib-
uted and consumed (Perrons, 2004). Hence,
social justice can only be giving meaning in the
context of a particular set of social relations.
Using territorial justice to make judgements
over the justness or otherwise of societies is
complicated in three ways: first, there are the
difficulties posed by theecological fallacy;
second, there are issues over the appropriate-
ness of the spatial definition of the territorial
units; and, third, the achievement of territorial
justice has to be set against what this might
mean for other forms of justice (Smith and
Lee, 2004). kwa
Suggested reading
Smith and Lee (2004).
territorial sea A jurisdictional zone of the
ocean, extending a maximum of 12 nautical
miles from the baseline (United Nations,
1983, Article 3) and including air space,
sea bed and subsoil. The territorial sea is
the ocean zone most exposed to human pres-
sure and resource use. The 1982 United
Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS) extends thesovereigntyof coastal
statesto include the territorial sea. Within the
zone, other nations have few prerogatives be-
yond the right of ‘innocent passage’, which rec-
ognizes the transit right of foreign flag merchant
vessels provided that it is peaceful and not
prejudicial to the good order or security of the
coastal state concerned. sch
Suggested reading
Valega (1992).
territoriality Either the organization and ex-
ercise ofpower, legitimate or otherwise, over
blocs ofspaceor the organization of people
and things into discrete areas through the use
ofboundaries. In studies ofanimalbehav-
iour, spatial division intoterritoriesis seen
as an evolutionary principle, a way of fostering
competition so that those best matched to
their territory will have more surviving off-
spring. With human territoriality, however,
spatial division is more typically thought of as
a strategy used by organizations and groups to
organize social, economic and political activ-
ities. From this viewpoint, space is partitioned
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_T Final Proof page 744 31.3.2009 9:40pm Compositor Name: ARaju
TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY