The Economist February 19th 2022 Science&technology 73
Potter. Mr Musk has talked of eventually
building a fleet of Starships. If each were
indeed launching several times a day, that
would give SpaceX the ability to lug a mil
lion tonnes of stuff into orbit each year.
BryceTech reckons that, in 2021, the world
managed 750 tonnes. What you might do
with all that capacity (other than supplying
a future Mars colony) is another question.
Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist
and rocket enthusiast at the Harvard
Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics,
notes that Starship’s colossal size might go
unused in the commercialsatellite mar
ket, at least for the foreseeable future.
“There just isn’t currently a market for
large numbers of enormous payloads,” he
says. SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy, with a payload
capacity of 64 tonnes, is the most powerful
rocket currently flying. Its first launch was
in 2018, but it has only flown twice since.
The satellite industry might adapt, in
time. In any case, Mr Musk has indicated
that Starship, thanks to its cheapness, will
replace SpaceX’s smaller Falcon rockets,
which already have a market share of
around 50%. If he sticks to that plan, then
early commercial launches of Starship
could fly with their holds mostly empty.
Congenital optimist
One mediumterm option might be space
tourism, says Mr Potter. Existing rockets
from Blue Origin or Virgin Galactic can al
ready carry a handful of thrillseekers into
space—though not to orbit. Starship could
take perhaps 100 people on an orbital trip,
or a smaller number even further and in
greater luxury.
On February 14th Jared Isaacman, an
American billionaire who has already
flown into orbit with SpaceX announced
that he had ordered three further flights
from the firm. The first two will use
SpaceX’s existing Falcon rockets—but the
third, said Mr Isaacman, should mark Star
ship’s first crewed flight. Meanwhile Yusa
ku Maezawa, a Japanese billionaire, has
contracted with SpaceX to send himself
and up to a dozen companions on a sixday
jaunt around the Moon and back.
Jennifer Heldmann, a planetary scien
tist at nasa’s Ames Research Centre who
has written a paper about what Starship
could do for science, is more excited. Star
ship’s upper stage is designed to be refu
elled in orbit, with extra fuel brought up in
the cargo bay of other Starships. A full refill
would require several extra flights. But the
payoff, says Dr Heldmann, would be the
ability to deposit 100 tonnes or more of car
go on the surface of almost any body in the
solar system. (The Perseverancerover that
landed on Mars last year had a total mass,
with its lander, of about four tonnes.)
Cheap launches might not be immedi
ately revolutionary. Science missions are
expensive, and even pricey launches make
up only a small chunk of the overall bud
get. But Dr Heldmann points out that Star
ship would enable much more ambitious
missions, getting scientists more bang for
their buck. One option, she says, would be
to fly larger quantities of cheaper kit. “All
that payload capacity means you could use
offtheshelf components rather than hav
ing to custommake and miniaturise
things,” she says.
Another option would simply be to go
big. Perseverance, which cost $2.7bn, car
ries a drill that can excavate a few inches of
Martian regolith. Starship, says Dr Held
mann, could carry a fullsized drilling rig
that could bore kilometres deep.
And it could also open up access to the
outer planets, which have historically been
tricky to send missions to. In recent years
the watery moons of Saturn and Jupiter
have overtaken Mars as the most promis
ing places to search for alien life. One
group of scientists has drawn up a plan to
use Starship to explore Neptune, which has
been visited just once before, in 1989, when
the American Voyager 2 probe zoomed by
on its way out of the solar system. Such a
space craft could weigh tens of tonnes,
compared with just 722kg for Voyager 2.
America’s government is another po
tential customer. The country’s newly
minted Space Force is looking into Star
ship for its Rocket Cargo programme,
which is designed to explore whether the
rocket could be used to deliver equipment
rapidly to anywhere on the planet. And
with space a vital part of warfighting,
America’s armed forces would welcome
the ability to replenish shotdown satel
lites quickly and cheaply.
nasa, meanwhile, has chosen a modi
fied version of Starship’s upper stage to fer
ry astronauts to the lunar surface as part of
its ambitious Artemis programme. Most of
Artemis is designed to use the Space
Launch System (sls), another jumbosized
rocketthatnasaisdevelopingasa succes
sortotheSpaceShuttle.Buttheslshasa
lowercargocapacitythanStarshipdoes,
anda launchcostprojectedat$2bna time.
IfStarshipworks,nasacouldcomeunder
pressuretoscraptheslsentirely.
SpaceX,foritspart,knowsexactlywhat
itwantstodowithStarship,evenbeforeit
starts thinking about Mars. Its Starlink
projectaimstouseswarmsofthousandsof
lowflying satellitesto beamhighspeed
internetto anywhereonEarth’s surface.
GwynneShotwell, SpaceX’schief execu
tive, hasnoted thattheglobaltelecom
munications market is worth perhaps
$1trna year.SpaceXthinksit mightreason
ablyaspiretoabout34%ofit.
Because lowflying satellites can see
onlya smallportionoftheEarth’ssurface,
Starlink requires enormous numbers of
them.Thefirmalreadyhasabout1,655in
orbit,abouta thirdofthetotalnumberof
active satellites in space. It has permission
from American regulators to fly 12,000,
and is trying to obtain a licence for 30,000.
But first, SpaceX has to make the rocket
work. In his press conference Mr Musk was
at pains to play down the probability of the
orbital test—when it happens—going
smoothly. Even if it did, plenty more test
ing would be needed before the rocket
would be ready to fly real cargo.
Regulatory battles may be looming, too.
The firm’s Boca Chica facility was built on
the understanding that it would be used
for the Falcon Heavy, a much smaller rock
et than Starship. Explosions from failed
flight tests have scattered debris over a
wide area, says Mr Manley, while road clo
sures annoy locals. Environmental regula
tors are reportedly unhappy, and pushing
for a full review of the firm’s licence. Mr
Musk has said that, in the worst case sce
nario, SpaceX would have to move Starship
development to Cape Canaveral in Florida,
which would delay things for months.
Nervous energy
Even then, Starship’s capabilities could go
unused. The true size of the market for
Starlink remains unknown. As for his
grandest ambition, it is not at all clear how
many people would volunteer to live on
Mars. The sales pitch, said Mr Musk, is that
“it’s going to be cramped, dangerous, diffi
cult, very hard work [and] you might die.”
Despite the technical challenges ahead,
it would take a bold person to bet against
SpaceX. In 2008, after the first three
launches of its tiny Falcon 1 rocket had
failed, the firm almost went under. But the
fourth launch worked. The Falcon 9’s im
pressive failurefree run was preceded by
more than a dozen unsuccessful attempts
to land its first stage. Mr Musk, for his part,
is confident. “[Starship] will work,” he
said. “There’ll beafewbumps along the
road, but it’ll work.”n
But who’s counting?
SpaceX valuation, $bn
Sources:PitchBook;TheEconomist *International Space Station
2
100
80
60
40
20
0
052002 10 15 22
Funding rounds and grants
FirstcrewedmissiontoISS*
FirstbatchofStarlinksatelliteslaunched
FalconHeavyfirstlaunch
Firstsuccessfullanding
ofFalcon9 firststage
CargoflightstoISS*begin
Firstorbital
flightofFalcon
FirstNASA
development
contract
20
First successful Starship test landing