The Economist - UK (2022-02-19)

(Antfer) #1
TheEconomistFebruary19th 2022
Graphic detail Crime in America

81


Why have murders


soared?


I


twasashorthoneymoon.OnJanuary
1st,  Alvin  Bragg  assumed  the  office  of
Manhattan district attorney. One of a new
class of “progressive prosecutors”—crimi­
nal­justice  reformers  who  aim  to  reduce
the number of people in prison—Mr Bragg
launched  a  spate  of  policy  changes.
Offenceslike  burglary  and  possession  of
certain  weapons  would  be  downgraded;
other  crimes  like  prostitution  and  resist­
ing arrest would no longer be prosecuted at
all. Weeks later, New York City witnessed a
sudden surge in violent crime. Two police
officers  were  killed  on  the  job.  Mr  Bragg
had to announce a u­turn.
America  has  seen  an  explosion  in  vio­
lence  since  the  start  of  the  covid­19  pan­
demic. The national murder rate increased
by  29%  between  2019  and  2020—the  larg­
est single­year jump since 1905. That wiped
out 20 years of progress on homicide. Data
for violence in 2021 are still being collect­
ed,  but  the  preliminary  evidence  suggests
that homicide continued to rise, albeit at a
less  sharp  rate.  Among  22  large  cities  that

have alreadyreported,murdersroseby4%
between 2020 and 2021.
As  Americans  try  to  make  sense  of  it,
some  have  blamed  progressive  policies
and  reformers  like  Mr  Bragg.  These  days
Republicans  are  criticising  President  Joe
Biden for being soft on crime. They also see
electoral  rewards  in  attacking  Democratic
rhetoric  to  “defund  the  police”—as  at­
tempted,  unsuccessfully,  in  liberal  cities
like  Austin  and  Los  Angeles.  But  new  evi­
dence  suggests  that  the  actual  blame  may
not lie with urban progressives.
To  test  this  hypothesis,  a  trio  of  social
scientists  examined  what  happened  to
crime  after  progressive  prosecutors  as­
sumed office in 35 cities and counties over
a six­year period. They found no detectable
effect  of  policy  change  on  rates  of  major
crimes including murders. The claim that
overly lax criminal­justice policy drove vi­
olence  looks  shaky;  so  too  does  the  pro­
gressive  contention  that  decriminalisa­
tion  would  drive  down  offences.  Separate
analysis  by  John  Pfaff,  a  criminologist  at
Fordham  University,  found  that  murders
went up by almost equal rates in cities with
and without progressive prosecutors.
The reality is that the murder wave has
affected every part of America—rural, sub­
urban and urban. Some blame the upheav­
al  of  the  pandemic.  Yet  the  spike  in  mur­
ders was not mirrored in other rich coun­
tries  that  endured  disruptive  lockdowns.

HomicideratesinCanada,Germanyand
Sweden only marginally increased.
Trends in murder are notoriously diffi­
cult to explain. Criminologists still cannot
agree on what drove the great homicide de­
cline that began in the 1990s. There is thus
considerable debate about what is causing
this  unfortunate  bit  of  American  excep­
tionalism. It is easier to rule explanations
out  than  endorse  any  single  one.  Progres­
sives  have  blamed  easy  access  to  guns,
which  Americans  bought  in  record  num­
bers during the pandemic years. Yet when
researchers at the University of California,
Davis,  computed  the  correlation  of  new
gun  purchases  with  murders,  they  found
very little.
The Economisttried its hand at this sta­
tistical conundrum by gathering high­fre­
quency  data  in  ten  cities  on  covid  spread,
lockdown severity and unemployment. We
found  that  homicide  rates  were  worse  in
areas  with  higher  unemployment.  This
was  also  true  in  areas  with  more  severe
lockdowns, which we measured using data
gathered  by  Google  on  the  change  in  peo­
ple’s mobility patterns. These correlations,
though  suggestive,  cannot  explain  what
caused the extraordinary upsurge.
That suggests that some humility about
policy is in order. Progressive and conser­
vative  politicians  have  all  failedtoarrest
the  murder  surge.  Simple  explanations,  it
turns out, are often simply wrong.n

Progressive prosecutors look more like
the scapegoat than the source

-100

-50

0

50

100

10 5 0 5 10152025
Monthsbefore/afterinauguration

↑Progressiveprosecutors
hadnoimpactonmurders

95%confidence

0

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

1990 95 2000 05 10 15 20

Britain

Canada
France

Germany

Sweden

United
States

Anchorage-43

Portland Seattle+. 0
99

Minneapolis 70 Rochester
60

Madison 147

Milwaukee 99 oo+^5

Boston
47

Chicago 66 Clev 61
Omaha 61 0 g Nw rk^49

Indianapolis 49

ColoradoSprings
88
LLo ee 8

tcc + 88

Fremont
101

Scottsdale 162 Virginia Beach
-43

rs Chesapeake 113

Memphis 49

Ana imm 00000

Atlanta 46

Lubbock
C n errrr 6 177

Garland-4

iingnggg 9

ChulaVista
173

Tucson 41
Houston BatonRouge 47
43

Laredo 198

Miami 40
500 km

Spokane 279

Increase Decrease 200%

100%
20%
InSeattle,a 68%riseinmurders
wasaccompaniedbymorepeople
stayingathome

Unemployment in New York City
nearlydoubled between 2019 and
2020,while murders rose by 49%

→ America has experienced an extraordinary, nationwide surge in violence. Less clear is what caused it

Murders per 100,000 people Change in murder rate, 201-20, %

Change in murder rate*, %
Since inauguration of progressive prosecutor

*In 5 American cities and counties between 2015 and 2021 Sources: “Prosecutorial reform and local crime rates”, by
Amanda Agan, Jennifer Doleac and Anna Harvey, working paper, 2021; Patrick Sharkey, americanviolence.org; FBI; World Bank
Free download pdf