174 Touch
Lederman, S. J., Klatzky, R. L., & Reed, C. L. (1993). Constraints
on haptic integration of spatially shared object dimensions.
Perception, 22,723–743.
Lederman, S. J., Loomis, J. M., & Williams, D. A. (1982). The role
of vibration in the tactual perception of roughness. Perception &
Psychophysics, 32,109–116.
Lederman, W., Summers, C., & Klatzky, R. (1996). Cognitive
salience of haptic object properties: Role of modality-encoding
bias.Perception, 25,983–998.
Lederman, S. J., & Taylor, M. M. (1972). Fingertip force, surface
geometry and the perception of roughness by active touch.
Perception & Psychophysics, 12,401–408.
Lederman, S. J., Thorne, G., & Jones, B. (1986). The perception of
texture by vision and touch: Multidimensionality and intersen-
sory integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception & Performance, 12,169–180.
Loomis, J. M. (1979). An investigation of tactile hyperacuity.
Sensory Processes, 3,289–302.
Loomis, J. M. (1990). A model of character recognition and legibil-
ity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 16,106–120.
Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J. (1991). Similarity of
tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view.
Perception, 20,167–177.
Loomis, J. M., & Lederman, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In
K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of
perception and human performances Vol. 2. Cognitive processes
and performance(pp. 31/1–31/41). New York: Wiley.
Maculuso, E., Frith, C. D., & Driver, J. (2000). Modulation of
human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. Science,
289,1206.
Marchetti, F. M., & Lederman, S. J. (1983). The haptic radial-
tangential effect: Two tests of Wong’s “moments of inertia”
hypothesis.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21,43–46.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Millar, S. (1975a). Effects of tactual and phonological similarity on
the recall of Braille letters by blind children. British Journal of
Psychology, 66,193–201.
Millar, S. (1975b). Spatial memory by blind and sighted children.
British Journal of Psychology, 66,449–459.
Millar, S. (1997). Reading by touch.London: Routledge.
Millar, S. (1999). Memory in touch. Psicothema, 11,747–767.
Millar, S. (in press). Reading by touch in blind children and adults.
In P. E. Bryant and T. Nunes (Eds.), Handbook of children’s
literacy.Dotrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Millar, S., & Al-Attar, Z. (2000). Vertical and bisection bias in active
touch.Perception, 29,481–500.
Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual
confusions among English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 27,338–352.
Misceo, G. F., Hershberger, W. A., & Mancini, R. L. (1999). Haptic
estimates of discordant visual-haptic size vary developmentally.
Perception & Psychophysics, 61,608–614.
MoBIC Consortium (1997). Mobility of blind and elderly people
interacting with computers. Final report.London: Royal Na-
tional Society of the Blind.
Murray, A. M. (1999). Engineering design and psychophysical
evaluation of a wearable vibrotactile display.Unpublished doc-
toral dissertation, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
Newell, F. N., Ernst, M. O., Tian, B. S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2001).
Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition.
Psychological Science, 12,37–42.
Nolan, C., & Morris, J. (1971). Improvement of tactual symbols for
blind children: Final report.Louisville, KY: American Printing
House for the Blind.
Pagano, C. C., & Turvey, M. T. (1992). Eigenvectors of the inertia
tensor and perceiving the orientation of a hand-held object by
dynamic touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 52,617–624.
Pagano, C. C., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Perceiving by dynamic
touch the distances reachable with irregular objects. Ecological
Psychology, 5,125–151.
Parkes, D. (1988). “Nomad”: An audio-tactile tool for the acquisi-
tion, use and management of spatially distributed information by
visually impaired people. In A. F. Tatham & A. G. Dodds (Eds.),
Proceedings of the second international symposium on maps and
graphics for visually impaired people(pp. 24–29). London: Inter-
national Cartographic Association Commission VII (Tactile and
Low Vision Mapping) and Royal National Institute for the Blind.
Pavani, F., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch:
Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological
Science, 11,353–359.
Phillips, J. R., & Johnson, K. O. (1981). Tactile spatial resolution: II.
Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey
afferents. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46,1192–1203.
Pont, S. C. (1997). Haptic curvature comparison.Utrecht, The
Netherlands: Helmholtz Instituut.
Pont, S. C., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (1997). Haptic
curvature discrimination at several regions of the hand. Percep-
tion & Psychophysics, 59,1225–1240.
Pont, S. C., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (1998).
Anisotropy in haptic curvature and shape perception. Percep-
tion, 27,573–589.
Pont, S. C., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (1999). Similar
mechanisms underlie curvature comparison by static and dynamic
touch.Perception and Psychophysics, 61,874–894.
Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind.Mahwah,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Quilliam, T. A. (1978). The structure of finger print skin. In G.
Gordon (Ed.), Active touch: The mechanism of recognition of
objects by manipulation(pp. 1–15). Oxford: Pergamon.
Reales, J. M., & Ballesteros, S. (1999). Implicit and explicit mem-
ory for visual and haptic objects: Cross-modal priming depends