208 Visual Perception of Objects
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of
human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115–
117.
Biederman, I. (1995). Visual identification. In S. M. Kosslyn &
D. N. Osherson (Eds.),An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 2,
Visual cognition(pp. 121–165). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted
images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual
object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 393–419.
Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual
object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception & Performance, 18(1), 121–133.
Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-
rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional
viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception & Performance, 19(6), 1162–1182.
Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W. (1973). Searching for
objects in real-world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy, 97(1), 22–27.
Binford, T. O. (1971).Visual perception by computer.Paper presented
at the IEEE Conference on Systems and Control, Miami, FL.
Bucher, N. M., & Palmer, S. E. (1985). Effects of motion on
perceived pointing of ambiguous triangles. Perception & Psy-
chophysics, 38(3), 227–236.
Buffart, H., & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1981). Structural information
theory. In H. G. Geissler, E. L. J. Leeuwenberg, S. Link, &
V. Sarris (Eds.), Modern issues in perception.Berlin, Germany:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a
two-dimensional interpolation theory of object recognition.Pro-
ceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 89,60–64.
Canny, J. F. (1986). A computational approach to edge detection.
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli-
gence, 8, 769–798.
Delis, D. C., Robertson, L. C., & Efron, R. (1986). Hemispheric
specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli.
Neuropsychologia, 24(2), 205–214.
DiLorenzo, J. R., & Rock, I. (1982). The rod-and-frame effect as a
function of the righting of the frame.Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8(4), 536–
546.
Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1996). Edge-assignment and figure-
ground segmentation in short-term visual matching. Cognitive
Psychology, 31,248–306.
Ebenholtz, S. M. (1977). Determinants of the rod-and-frame effect:
The role of retinal size. Perception & Psychophysics, 22(6),
531–538.
Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in
the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional
objects.Vision Research, 32(12), 2385–2400.
Ellis, A. W., & Young, A. W. (1988). Human cognitive neuropsy-
chology.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Essen, D. C. Van, & DeYoe, E. A. (1995). Concurrent processing in
the primate visual cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cogni-
tive neurosciences(pp. 383–400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual agnosia: Disorders of object recognition
and what they tell us about normal vision.Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Farah, M. J. (1992). Is an object and object an object?: Cognitive
and neuropsychological investigations of domain specificity in
visual object recognition. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 1,164–169.
Farah, M. J. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of vision.Malden,
MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Gerbino, W. (1994). Achromatic transparency. In A. L. Gilchrist
(Ed.),Lightness, brightness, and transparency(pp. 215–255).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and develop-
ment.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gregory, R. L. (1972). Cognitive contours. Nature, 238,51–52.
Heydt, R. von der, Peterhans, E., & Baumgartner, G. (1984).
Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science, 224
(4654), 1260–1262.
Hochberg, J., & McAlister, E. (1953). A quantitative approach to figural
“goodness.”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46,361–364.
Hochberg, J., & Silverstein, A. (1956). A quantitative index for stim-
ulus similarity: Proximity versus differences in brightness.
American Journal of Psychology, 69,480–482.
Hoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition:
Visual cognition [Special issue]. Cognition, 18(1-3), 65–96.
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular
interaction, and functional architecture of the cat’s visual cortex.
Journal of Physiology (London), 160,106–154.
Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a
neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review,
99 (3),480–517.
Hummel, J. E., & Stankiewicz, B. J. (1996). Categorical relations in
shape perception. Spatial Vision, 10(3), 201–236.
Huttenlocher, D. P., & Ullman, S. (1987). Object recognition
using alignment(MIT AI Memo No. 937). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects.
Memory & Cognition, 13(4), 289–303.
Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1984). Pictures and
names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16(2),
243–275.
Julesz, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and
their interactions. Nature, 290(5802), 91–97.
Kanizsa, G. (1955). Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimo-
lazione omogenea. Rivista di Psicologia, 49,7–30.
Kanizsa, G. (1979). Organization in vision: Essays on Gestalt
perception.New York: Praeger.