References 209Kanizsa, G., & Gerbino, W. (1976). Convexity and symmetry in
figure-ground organization. In M. Henle (Ed.), Vision and
artifact(pp. 25–32). New York: Springer.
Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual inter-
polation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23(2),
141–221.
Kinchla, R. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual process-
ing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out.”Perception &
Psychophysics, 25(3), 225–231.
Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1979). The internal represen-
tation of solid shape with respect to vision. Biological Cyber-
netics, 32,211–216.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology.New York:
Harcourt, Brace.
Kopferman, H. (1930). Psychologishe Untersuchungen uber die
Wirkung Zweidimensionaler korperlicher Gebilde. Psychologis-
che Forschung, 13,293–364.
Kubovy, M., & Gepstein, S. (2000). Gestalt: From phenomena to
laws. In K. Boyer & S. Sarkar (Eds.), Perceptual organiza-
tion for artificial vision systems(pp. 41–72). Dordrecht, the
Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Kubovy, M., & Wagemans, J. (1995). Grouping by proximity and
multistability in dot lattices: A quantitative Gestalt theory.
Psychological Science, 6(4), 225–234.
Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1971). A perceptual coding language for
visual and auditory patterns. American Journal of Psychology,
84 (3), 307–349.
Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1978). Quantification of certain visual
pattern properties: Salience, transparency, and similarity. In
E. L. J. Leeuwenberg & H. F. J. M. Buffart (Eds.), Formal theo-
ries of visual perception(pp. 277–298). New York: Wiley.
Leung, T., & Malik, J. (1998).Contour continuity in region based
image segmentation.Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th
European Conference on Computer Vision, Freiburg, Germany.
Lissauer, H. (1988). A case of visual agnosia with a contribution to
theory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(2), 157–192. (Original
work published 1890)
Lowe, D. G. (1985). Perceptual organization and visual recogni-
tion.Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Mach, E. (1959). The analysis of sensations.Chicago: Open Court.
(Original work published 1914)
Malik, J., & Perona, P. (1990). Preattentive texture discrimination
with early vision mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of
America A, 7(5), 923–932.
Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perceptions: An
approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and
perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15,238–300.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the
human representation and processing of visual information.San
Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Marr, D., & Hildreth, E. C. (1980). Theory of edge detection.Pro-
ceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 207,187–217.
Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition
of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceed-
ings of the Royal Society London, 200,269–294.
Massaro, D. W., & Hary, J. M. (1986). Addressing issues in letter
recognition.Psychological Research, 48(3), 123–132.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive
activation model of context effects in letter perception: I.
An account of basic findings.Psychological Review, 88(5),
375– 407.
Metelli, F. (1974). The perception of transparency. Scientific
American, 230(4), 90–98.
Miller, J. (1981). Global precedence in attention and decision.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Per-
formance, 7(6), 1161–1174.
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge.
In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision
(pp. 211–280).New York: McGraw Hill.
Nakayama, K., He, Z. J., & Shimojo, S. (1995). Visual surface
representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-
level vision. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Visual
cognition: An invitation to cognitive science(2nd ed., Vol. 2,
pp. 1–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Navon, D. (1976). Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambi-
guities in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance, 2,130–138.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Ober-Thompkins, B. A. (1982). The effects of typicality on picture
perception and memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of California, Berkeley.
Palmer, S. E. (1975a). The effects of contextual scenes on the iden-
tification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3(5), 519–526.
Palmer, S. E. (1975b). Visual perception and world knowledge:
Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In D. A.
Norman & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Explorations in cognition
(pp. 279–307). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Palmer, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual represen-
tation.Cognitive Psychology, 9(4), 441–474.
Palmer, S. E. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representa-
tion. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categoriza-
tion(pp. 261–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Palmer, S. E. (1980). What makes triangles point: Local and global
effects in configurations of ambiguous triangles. Cognitive
Psychology, 12(3), 285–305.
Palmer, S. E. (1985). The role of symmetry in shape perception.
Acta Psychologica, 59(1), 67–90.
Palmer, S. E. (1989). Reference frames in the perception of shape
and orientation. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object
perception: Structure and process(pp. 121–163). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Palmer, S. E. (1992). Common region: A new principle of percep-
tual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 436–447.