Handbook of Psychology, Volume 4: Experimental Psychology

(Axel Boer) #1
References 263

B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and
talk(Vol. 1, pp. 373–420). London: Academic Press.
Fowler, C. A., & Saltzman, E. (1993). Coordination and coarticula-
tion in speech production. Language and Speech, 36,171–195.
Fowler, C. A., & Smith, M. (1986). Speech perception as “vector
analysis”: An approach to the problems of segmentation and
invariance. In J. Perkell & D. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and
variability of speech processes(pp. 123–136). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fox, R. (1984). Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 10,526–540.
Fromkin, V. (1973). Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The
Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word
perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Per-
ception and Performance, 6,110–125.
Garrett, M. (1980). Levels of processing in speech production. In
B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and
talk(pp. 177–220). London: Academic Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gick, B. (1999). The articulatory basis of syllable structure: A study
of English glides and liquids.Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Gleason, P., Tuller, B., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1996). Syllable affiliation of
final consonant clusters undergoes a phase transition over speak-
ing rates.Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech
and Language Processing(pp. 276–278). Philadelphia, PA.
Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spo-
ken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,
22,1166–1183.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of
lexical access.Psychological Review, 105,251–279.
Grieser, D., & Kuhl, P. (1989). Categorization of speech by infants:
Support for speech-sound prototypes. Developmental Psychol-
ogy, 25,577–588.
Guenther, F., Hampson, M., & Johnson, D. (1998). A theoretical
investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech.
Psychological Review, 105,611–633.
Guilford, J., & Park, D. (1931). The effect of interpolated weights
upon comparative judgments. American Journal of Psychology,
43,589–599.
Hagiwara, R. (1995). Acoustic realizations of American /r/ as
produced by women and men. UCLA Working Papers in Pho-
netics, 90.
Hamlet, S. (1988). Speech compensation for prosthodontially created
palatal asymmetries.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,
31,48–53.


Hamlet, S., & Stone, M. (1978). Compensatory alveolar consonant
production induced by wearing a dental prosthesis. Journal of
Phonetics, 6, 227–248.
Hintzman, D. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple trace
memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428.
Hockett, C. (1955). A manual of phonetics. Bloominton: Indiana
University Press.
Humbolt, W. Von. (1972). Linguistic variability and intellectual
development.(G. C. Buck & F. A. Raven, Trans.) Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press. (Original work published
1836)
Jakobson, R., Fant, G., & Halle, M. (1962). Preliminaries to speech
analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keating, P. (1983). Comments on the jaw and syllable structure.
Journal of Phonetics, 11,401–406.
Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of
brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kelso, J. A. S., Tuller, B., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Fowler, C. A.
(1984). Functionally-specific articulatory cooperation following
jaw perturbation during speech: Evidence for coordinative struc-
tures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception
and Performance, 10,812–832.
Kent, R., & Tjaden, K. (1997). Brain functions underlying speech.
In W. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic
sciences(pp. 221–255). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
Kluender, K. (1994). Speech perception as a tractable problem in
cognitive science. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of Psy-
cholinguistics(pp. 173–217). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Krakow, R. (1989). The articulatory organization of syllables: A
kinematic analysis of labial and velar gestures.Unpublished
doctoral dissertation. Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Krakow, R. (1993). Nonsegmental influences on velum movement
patterns: Syllables, segments, stress and speaking rate. In M.
Huffman & R. Krakow (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology: Vol. 5.
Nasals, nasalization and the velum(pp. 87–116). New York:
Academic Press.
Krakow, R. (1999). Physiological organization of syllables: A
review. Journal of Phonetics, 27,23–54.
Kuhl, P. (1987). The special-mechanisms debate in speech research:
Categorization tests on animals and infants. In S. Harnad (Ed.),
Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition(pp. 355–
386). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhl, P. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “percep-
tual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, mon-
keys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50,93–107.
Kuhl, P., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the per-
ceptual magnet effect. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception
and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research
(pp. 121–154). Baltimore: York Press.
Kuhl, P., & Miller, J. D. (1978). Speech perception by the chinchilla:
Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli. Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America, 63,905–917.
Free download pdf