Handbook of Psychology, Volume 4: Experimental Psychology

(Axel Boer) #1

314 Action Selection


Hommel, B. (1993b). The role of attention for the Simon effect.
Psychological Research, 55,208–222.
Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in
dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance, 24,1368–1384.
Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (Eds.). (1997).Theoretical issues in
stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reac-
tion time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45,188–196.
Hyman, R., & Umiltà, C. (1969). The information hypothesis and
non-repetitions.Acta Psychologica, 30,37–53.
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., & Mazziotta, J. C. (1998). Bimodal
(auditory and visual) left frontoparietal circuitry for senso-
rimotor integration and sensoimotor learning. Brain, 121,
2135–2143.
Jastrow, J. (1890). The time-relations of mental phenomena. New
York: N.D.C. Hodges.
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Chronometric analysis of intelligence. Journal
of Social Biological Structure, 3,103–122.
Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology,
14,(Whole No. 89).
Kantowitz, B. H., & Sanders, M. S. (1972). Partial advance infor-
mation and stimulus dimensionality. Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 92,412–418.
Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). The role of stimulus-based and
response-based spatial information on sequence learning. Jour-
nal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogni-
tion, 26,863–882.
Kornblum, S. (1967). Choice reaction time for repetitions and non-
repetitions.Acta Psychologica, 27,178–187.
Kornblum, S. (1968). Serial-choice reaction time: Inadequacies of
the information hypothesis. Science, 159,432–434.
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional
overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A
model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97,253–270.
Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibil-
ity with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimension that do and
do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: Human Perception and Performance, 21,855–875.
Kvälseth, T. O. (1980). An alternative to the Hick-Hyman’s and
Sternberg’s Law. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50,1281–1282.
Kvälseth, T. O. (1989). Longstreth et al.’s reaction time model:
Some comments. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27,
358–360.
Lamberts, K., Tavernier, G., & D’Ydewalle, G. (1992). Effects of
multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compati-
bility. Acta Psychologica, 79,115–130.
Leonard, J. A. (1958). Partial advance information in a choice reac-
tion task. British Journal of Psychology, 49,89–96.
Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial corre-
spondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of


Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
26,1260–1280.
Lippa, Y. (1996). A referential-coding explanation for compatibility
effects of perceptually orthogonal stimulus and response dimen-
sions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A,
950–971.
Lippa, Y., & Adam, J. J. (2001). An explanation of orthogonal S-R
compatibility effects that vary with hand or response position:
The end-state comfort hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics,
63,156–174.
Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action:
A users’ guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach &
T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and
language(pp. 189–239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Logan, G. D., & Irwin, D. E. (2000). Don’t look! Don’t touch!
Inhibitory control of hand and eye movements. Psychonomic
Bulletin & Review, 7,107–112.
Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval
in dual-task situations: Semantic memory. Journal of Experi-
mental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26,
1072–1090.
Longsteth, L. E. (1988). Hick’s law: Its limit is 3 bits. Bulletin of the
Psychonomic Society, 26,8–10.
Longstreth, L. E., El-Zahhar, N., & Alcorn, M. B. (1985). Excep-
tions to Hick’s Law: Explorations with a response duration mea-
sure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114,41–74.
Los, S. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring infor-
mation processing in pure and mixed blocks. Acta Psychologica,
94,145–188.
Loveless, N. E. (1962). Direction-of-motion stereotypes: A review.
Ergonomics, 5,357–383.
Lowe, D. G. (1979). Strategies, context and the mechanisms of
response inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 7,382–389.
Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location
information on performance: A review of the Simon effect and spa-
tial Stroop effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2,174–207.
Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Influence of irrelevant informa-
tion on human performance: Effects of S-R association strength
and relative timing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy, 54A,95–136.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop ef-
fect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin, 109,163–203.
Mangun, G. R., Hopfinger, J. B., & Heinze, H.-J. (1998). Integrating
electrophysiology and neuroimaging in the study of human cog-
nition.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,
30,118–130.
May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of neg-
ative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118,35–54.
McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes:
A framework for analyzing processes in cascade. Psychological
Review, 88,375–407.
Free download pdf