316 Action Selection
G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation
(Vol. 21, pp. 1–52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes
and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks. Psychological
Research, 59,196–211.
Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Auditory stimulus-
response compatibility: Is there a contribution of stimulus-hand
correspondence?Psychological Research, 63,148–158.
Rugg, M. D., & Coles, M. G. H. (Eds.). (1995). Electrophysiology
of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition. Oxford,
England: Oxford University Press.
Sanders, A. F. (1975). The foreperiod effect revisited. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27,591–598.
Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance. Mahwah,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Sanders, A. F., & Wertheim, A. H. (1973). The relation between
physical stimulus properties and the effect of foreperiod duration
on reaction time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy, 25,201–206.
Schweickert, R. (1983). Latent network theory: Scheduling of
processes in sentence verification and the Stroop effect. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
9,353–383.
Seibel, R. (1963). Discrimination reaction time for a 1,023-alternative
task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66,215–226.
Shaffer, L. H. (1965). Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70,284–288.
Smith, E. E. (1968). Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major
theoretical positions. Psychological Bulletin, 69,77–110.
Soetens, E. (1998). Localizing sequential effects in serial choice
reaction time with the information reduction procedure. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor-
mance, 24,547–568.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Exten-
sions of Donders’ method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and
performance II.Acta Psychologica, 30,276–315.
Sternberg, S. (1998). Discovering mental processing stages: The
method of additive factors. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg
(Eds.),An invitation to cognitive science: Methods, models, and
conceptual issues(2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 703–863). Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Stoffer, T. H., & Umiltà, C. (1997). Spatial stimulus coding and
the focus of attention in S-R compatibility and the Simon ef-
fect. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in
stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 181–208). Amsterdam:
North-Holland.
Stroop, J. R. (1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reac-
tions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121,
15–23. (Original work published 1935)
Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The
role of LTM links and STM links in the Simon effect. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
26,648–670.
Teichner, W., & Krebs, M. J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction
time.Psychological Review, 81,75–98.
Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and
associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14,
1–36.
Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response com-
patibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-
response compatibility: An integrated perspective(pp. 89–116).
Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Van Zandt, T., Colonius, H., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). A comparison
of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7,208–256.
Vickrey, C., & Neuringer, A. (2000). Pigeon reaction time, Hick’s
law, and intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7,
284–291.
Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of right-left and
top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibil-
ity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 27,813–828.
Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Mixing compatible and
incompatible mappings: Elimination, reduction, and enhance-
ment of spatial compatibility effects. Manuscript submitted for
publication.
Wang, H., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Stimulus-response compatibility
as a function of stimulus code and response modality. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
22,1201–1217.
Weeks, D. J., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in
the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response di-
mensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119,
355–366.
Weeks, D. J., Proctor, R. W., & Beyak, B. (1995). Stimulus-response
compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally ori-
ented responses: Evidence for spatial coding. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 48,367–383.
Welford, A. T. ( 1987). Comment on “Exceptions to Hick’s law:
Explorations with a response duration measure” (Longstreth,
El-Zahhar, & Alcorn, 1985). Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy: General, 116,312–314.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information
processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41,67–85.
Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York:
Holt.
Wundt, W. (1883). Über psychologische Methoden [Over psycho-
logical methods]. Philosophische Studien, 10,1–38.