472 Semantic Memory and Priming
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recog-
nition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D.
Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading:
Visual word recognition(pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Neely, J. H., & Kahan, T. A. (2001). Is semantic activation auto-
matic? A critical re-evaluation. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S.
Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of re-
membering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder(pp. 69–93).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Neely, J. H., & Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on
visual word processing: A hybrid prospective-retrospective pro-
cessing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning
and motivation: Advances in research and theory(Vol. 24,
pp. 207–248). New York: Academic Press.
Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic prim-
ing in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-
generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 15,1003–1019.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1991). The
University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word
fragment norms.Unpublished manuscript.
Oscar-Berman, M. (1984). Comparative neuropsychology and alco-
holic Korsakoff disease. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.),
Neuropsychology of Memory(pp. 194–202). New York: Guilford
Press.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The mea-
surement of meaning.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Perruchet, P., & Baveux, P. (1989). Correlational analyses of ex-
plicit and implicit memory performance. Memory & Cognition,
17,77–86.
Peterson, R. R., & Simpson, G. B. (1989). Effect of backward prim-
ing on word recognition in single-word and sentence contexts.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 15,1020–1032.
Plaut, D. C., & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental
differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational
support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing.
Psychological Review, 107,786–823.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K.
(1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Com-
putational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological
Review, 103,56–115.
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive
control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cogni-
tion(pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Quillian, M. R. (1967). Word concepts: A theory and simulation
of some basic semantic capabilities.Behavioral Science, 12,
410–430.
Quillian, M. R. (1969). The teachable language comprehender.
Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery,
12,459–476.
Rappold, V. A., & Hashtroudi, S. (1991). Does organization improve
priming?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Mem-
ory, and Cognition, 17,103–114.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1981). Does activation really spread?
Psychological Review, 88,454–462.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1982). Speed and accuracy in the pro-
cessing of false statements about semantic information. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
8,16–36.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in
memory. Psychological Review, 95,385–408.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1996). Bias effects in implicit mem-
ory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125,
403–421.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit
priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review,
104,319–343.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2000). Modeling the effects of repeti-
tion and word frequency in perceptual identification. Psycho-
nomic Bulletin & Review, 7,713–717.
Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of mem-
ory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39,475–543.
Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Picture naming. In
G. W. Humphreys & M. Riddoch (Eds.), Visual object process-
ing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach(pp. 107–143).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance
and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12,1–20.
Roediger, H. L., III. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without
remembering.American Psychologist, 45,1043–1056.
Roediger, H. L., III, & Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying
modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming
in word-fragment completion.Memory & Cognition, 15,379–
388.
Roediger, H. L., III, Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Ex-
plaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of
retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M.
Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in
honour of Endel Tulving(pp. 2–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rosenblatt, F. (1962). Principles of neurodynamics.New York:
Spartan.
Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C. S., & Mars, F.
(1997). Morphological priming, fragment completion, and con-
nectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 36,
382–405.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel dis-
tributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cogni-
tion: Vol. 1. Foundations.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schacter, D. L. (1990). Perceptual representation systems and im-
plicit memory: Toward a resolution of the multiple memory