Islam and Modernity: Key Issues and Debates

(singke) #1
The Shifting Politics of Identity 281


  1. One of Voll’s types of response, the individualist style of action, is not further
    discussed in the chapter. Why do you think this is the case? Is identity
    construction necessarily a form of social engagement? What are the meaning and
    role of the individual in the framework of modern Muslim identities?

  2. Muslim reform has commonly been understood as a process of renewal or return
    to the original spirit of the faith. However, it may be claimed that every renewal is
    also an invention. What elements of return, and what elements of invention, do
    you discern in modern reformism?

  3. This chapter suggests that the uniqueness of Muslim identity as conceptualised
    by Khan was a collective right. Does the individual disappear in this framework?
    Discuss one other Islamic reformist in the light of the same question.

  4. Which differences do you perceive between reformists and Islamists with respect
    to identity formation? Probe their different conceptualisation of universals and
    particularities, and discuss the implications this may have for state formation.

  5. Traditionalist scholars appear more concerned about the individual than their
    reformist or Islamist counterparts. How could this be the case? What does their
    concern with the individual mean, and how does it relate to identity construction in
    modern egalitarian states?

  6. Do these observations imply that the attitude of the traditionalist ulama could be
    more compatible with a modern focus on the individual than that of the reformists
    and Islamists?


Notes



  1. A number of North African scholars, beginning with Abdallah Laroui, have identifi ed
    this bifurcated critique to examine the crisis of the modern Arab intellectuals
    (Laroui 1976; Hanafi 1996; Hamil 2002).

  2. The evolutionary thesis is not fully represented in his Khutubat, but the emphasis
    on the immutability of the laws of God is clearly present.

  3. This book appeared in English translation under the title A Short History of the
    Revivalist Movement in Islam (Maudoodi 1972).

  4. See also Adams’s and Brown’s analysis of this direction in Mawdudi’s approach.
    Brown also links this to an earlier Indian reformist, Shibli (Adams 1976; Brown 1996).

  5. Similarly, and equally convincingly, Binder has argued that Qutb, another leading
    Islamist, has resolved this dilemma by relying on a device from literary theory and
    subjective consciousness. Developing the idea of a visioning (al-tasawwur), Qutb’s
    exegesis appealed to the need for attaining understanding by way of a total vision
    (Binder 1988: 185).

  6. At the time, Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Syria and the
    People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen signed the document (Artz 1990: 216).
    According to Kelsay, Pakistan signed without reservation on the basis of a
    reformist approach to Islamic law (Kelsay, in Little et al. 1988).

  7. Islamist movements themselves were not consistent in their ideological
    commitment. Mawdudi supported the candidature of Fatima Jinnah in the 1965
    presidential elections, departing from his extremely conservative, and naturalist,
    view of the role of women in Muslim society. He argued on the basis of a
    traditionalist juridical principle of choosing the lesser of two evils, and the right of a
    political leader to deduce new rulings just like the early caliphs had done, to justify
    the vote for Fatima Jinnah against Ayyub Khan (Sayeed 1966; McDonough 1984:

Free download pdf