The Internet Encyclopedia (Volume 3)

(coco) #1

P1: JDV


Westfall WL040/Bidgolio-Vol I WL040-Sample.cls June 20, 2003 13:27 Char Count= 0


444 TELECOMMUTING ANDTELEWORK

PERSONAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND
TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANTAGES AND
DISADVANTAGES
(EXPLICIT, WEAKER EFFECTS)

SOCIOLOGICAL AND
ORGANIZATIONAL ADVANTAGES
AND DISADVANTAGES
(IMPLICIT, STRONGER EFFECTS)

DEMAND FOR
TELECOMMUTING

Figure 3: Explicit and implicit advantages and disadvantages
model.

Agency Theory
This theory views relationships between managers and
employees (and other economic relationships) as implicit
contracts. In such relationships, an employee (agent) can
be compensated either on the basis of behavior (what he
or she is doing) or on outcomes (results, e.g., commissions
on sales). In a typical office environment, where employ-
ees are physically present every working day, it is relatively
easy to monitor behavior.
The more days per week an employee telecommutes,
the more difficult it is to monitor behavior, and it becomes
increasingly necessary to evaluate outcomes. For employ-
ees who are doing anything other than very routine pro-
cessing, however, it is often difficult to measure outcomes.
Typically it requires more managerial time (an expense
item) to evaluate outcomes than monitor performance.
Thus agency theory provides a plausible explanation for
the often-noted reluctance of managers to allow telecom-
muting, and also the prevalence of 1-day-per-week classic
telecommuting arrangements.
On the other hand, there have been numerous success-
ful projects, in which organizations have generated large
real estate savings by having salespersons and consultants
work largely away from organizational offices. Although
it may be more appropriate to identify these employees
as mobile workers, the continuing usage of these arrange-
ments (in contrast to the many classic telecommuting im-
plementations that have not persisted) is exactly what
agency theory would predict. Because such employees
typically work on commissions or generate billings, they
are already operating under outcome-based contracts.
Therefore, the shift away from organizational offices re-
quires relatively minor adjustments by their managers.
(For more information on agency theory, see Eisenhardt,
1989.)

Institutional Theory
Sociologists consider the business office to be an institu-
tion: something that is considered by the larger society as
the norm, the “right” way to do knowledge work. These
norms transcend distances and cultural differences; for
example, business offices in the United States, Asia, and
Africa are more similar or homogenous than the underly-
ing cultures and political systems.
Although office work is highly institutionalized, clas-
sic telecommuting has not yet reached that status. (As
an indicator, although business offices often form the set-
ting for scenes in movies or television shows, telecom-
muting workers are rarely seen.) It has a certain air of

illegitimacy: other employees may view a person who is
telecommuting as “not really working” while away from
the office (e.g., Scott Adams’ portrayals of telecommuters
in theDilbertcomic strip often reflect this perspective).
Neighbors may wonder if the telecommuter has lost his
job. Telecommuting consultants frequently recommend
increased managerial planning with and supervision of
telecommuters, but from the perspective of institutional
theory, this raises additional questions about the legiti-
macy of this mode of work in the minds of both employees
and managers.
Institutional theory thus provides an alternative expla-
nation for the low rate of telecommuting. Most people
don’t telecommute at all, or very much, because it is not
as socially acceptable as traditional office work. This the-
ory also accounts for the frequent association of telecom-
muting and health issues, for example, doing some work
at home on days when an employee is ill or has a medical
appointment. Telecommuting becomes more legitimate if
there is an “excuse” for it, a connection with something
that is recognized as an acceptable reason for being away
from the office. (The seminal work on neo-institutional
theory is Meyer and Rowan, 1977.)

RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR STAKEHOLDERS
One of the impediments to increased classic telecommut-
ing is that there are a number of types of stakeholders, and
what is good for one stakeholder is not necessarily a ben-
efit for all the others. Therefore recommendations must
be addressed to the various stakeholders, but also must be
harmonious with the needs and expectations of the oth-
ers. It is appropriate to start with organizations, because
organizational policies and attitudes are usually the most
important factor in determining whether specific employ-
ees can telecommute and how much telework occurs.

Organizations
Employers need to consider telecommuting from a holis-
tic perspective, so that they can deal with it based on
its impacts on the overall performance of the whole
organization, rather than just looking at how it affects the
telecommuters. In many cases, this perspective will lead
to organizational policies that are not directed specifically
toward telework but which, as a side effect, will lead to
modest increases in classic telecommuting.
Organizations need to have contingency plans and or-
ganizational capabilities that make it possible to function
effectively in the event of a disaster. The more employees
who have computer equipment and high-speed connec-
tions at home and who are comfortable using these capa-
bilities, the better prepared they are for disasters. These
capabilities also enable employees to work more effec-
tively at home after and before regular working hours at
the office, contributing to increased organizational pro-
ductivity. And finally, this kind of infrastructure at home
can lead to increases in classic telecommuting.
Therefore, organizational policies that make it easier
or less expensive (or both) to acquire quality hardware,
software, and telecommunications services can be very
Free download pdf