P1: JDW
Zimmerman WL040/Bidgolio-Vol I WL040-Sample.cls June 20, 2003 17:20 Char Count= 0
520 USABILITYTESTING:ANEVALUATIONPROCESS FORINTERNETCOMMUNICATIONSCollect Data
Whenever possible, use multiple data collection meth-
ods to minimize the chances of drawing erroneous con-
clusions. Verbal protocol analyses often include direct
observations of participants, videotaping their actions,
recording their comments, and having them complete
questionnaires. When participants arrive for testing, pro-
vide a brief overview of the evaluation, but do not make
judgmental statements that may bias the test results.
Brief participants on all forms, have them complete the
forms, and give them the honorarium. Once they have
signed the forms and completed pre-questionnaires, ac-
company participants to test rooms. Orient participants
to the equipment and Web site they will be evaluating,
give them the scenarios, and review the scenarios with
them.
When videotaping or audio taping participants’ com-
ments, make sure the video cameras and audio equipment
work properly and that you have sufficient tape to com-
plete the session. Brief participants on their tasks, and
remind them to think aloud as they work. As participants
work, you may need to remind them to keep talking and
telling you what they are thinking.
While participants are working, remain as unobtrusive
as possible, yet remain available to participants if they
need help or become anxious. Use observational logs (see
Figure 2) to record your observations and notes of the
problems they encounter. Should a participant become
nervous or irritated, stop the testing. After participants
have left each verbal protocol analyses session, write a
succinct summary of the test session, your observations,the participant’s response to testing, and the problems the
participant encountered.Analyze Data
Analyzing data can involve both qualitative and quantita-
tive tasks. For example, textual notes from exit interviews
require qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis requires
reading through the responses, familiarizing oneself
with the responses, and then summarizing the findings
verbally. On the other hand, questionnaires with set
responses generate quantitative data. Summarizing re-
sponses to such questions requires entering the data into a
spreadsheet or statistical analyses program, such as SPSS
or SAS, for statistical analyses.
Use triangulation to validate findings by comparing
data from different methodologies. For example, a re-
searcher may validate data about a site’s navigational
aides from his or her observation notes, screen tracking
software, open-ended questions, and the usability ques-
tionnaire.Interpret the Data
Consider prioritizing the severity of the problems. Re-
sources, staff members, and the time available to cor-
rect the problems are often limited, so many organiza-
tions must rank order the problems and correct only the
more serious or critical ones or those that will affect the
largest number of users. Severity ratings can be based on
the time required to complete a task, the number of users
who might encounter the problem, the negative impact onUsability Observation Form Page Number _____Participant No. _________________________Observational Sheet _________________________Date: _________________________Observer: _________________________Search engine _________________________Task
NumberBeginning
TimeEnd
TimeProblem/ how resolvedFigure 2: Observational sheet for recording participants actions when carrying out
tasks.