Introduction to Corporate Finance

(avery) #1
Ross et al.: Fundamentals
of Corporate Finance, Sixth
Edition, Alternate Edition

VI. Cost of Capital and
Long−Term Financial
Policy

(^584) 16. Raising Capital © The McGraw−Hill
Companies, 2002
USM has experienced a variety of difficulties in the past, including cost overruns,
regulatory delays in building a nuclear-powered electricity-generating plant, and below-
normal profits. These difficulties are reflected in the fact that USM’s market-to-book ra-
tio is $5/10 .50 (successful firms rarely have market prices below book values).
Net income for USM is currently $1 million. With one million shares, earnings per
share are $1, and the return on equity is $1/10 10%.^10 USM thus sells for five times
earnings (the price-earnings ratio is 5). USM has 200 shareholders, each of whom holds
5,000 shares. The new plant will cost $2 million, so USM will have to issue 400,000
new shares ($5 400,000 $2 million). There will thus be 1.4 millionshares out-
standing after the issue.
The ROE on the new plant is expected to be the same as for the company as a whole.
In other words, net income is expected to go up by .10 $2 million $200,000. Total
net income will thus be $1.2 million. The following will result if the plant is built:



  1. With 1.4 million shares outstanding, EPS will be $1.2/1.4 $.857, down from $1.

  2. The proportionate ownership of each old shareholder will drop to 5,000/1.4 million
    .36 percent from .50 percent.

  3. If the stock continues to sell for five times earnings, then the value will drop to 5 
    $.857 $4.29, representing a loss of $.71 per share.

  4. The total book value will be the old $10 million plus the new $2 million, for a total
    of $12 million. Book value per share will fall to $12 million/1.4 million $8.57.
    If we take this example at face value, then dilution of proportionate ownership, ac-
    counting dilution, and market value dilution all occur. USM’s stockholders appear to
    suffer significant losses.


A Misconception Our example appears to show that selling stock when the market-
to-book ratio is less than 1 is detrimental to the stockholders. Some managers claim that
the resulting dilution occurs because EPS will go down whenever shares are issued
when the market value is less than the book value.
When the market-to-book ratio is less than 1, increasing the number of shares does
cause EPS to go down. Such a decline in EPS is accounting dilution, and accounting di-
lution will always occur under these circumstances.
Is it furthermore true that market value dilution will necessarily occur? The answer
is no. There is nothing incorrect about our example, but why the market value has de-
creased is not obvious. We discuss this next.

The Correct Arguments In this example, the market price falls from $5per share to
$4.29. This is true dilution, but why does it occur? The answer has to do with the new
project. USM is going to spend $2 millionon the new plant. However, as shown in
Table 16.11, the total market value of the company is going to rise from $5 millionto $6
million, an increase of only $1 million. This simply means that the NPV of the new proj-
ect is $1 million. With 1.4 million shares, the loss per share is $1/1.4 $.71, as we
calculated before.
So, true dilution takes place for the shareholders of USM because the NPV of the proj-
ect is negative, not because the market-to-book ratio is less than 1. This negative NPV
causes the market price to drop, and the accounting dilution has nothing to do with it.

556 PART SIX Cost of Capital and Long-Term Financial Policy


(^10) Return on equity, or ROE, is equal to earnings per share divided by book value per share, or, equivalently,
net income divided by common equity. We discuss this and other financial ratios in some detail in Chapter 3.

Free download pdf