Ross et al.: Fundamentals
of Corporate Finance, Sixth
Edition, Alternate Edition
VI. Cost of Capital and
Long−Term Financial
Policy
- Financial Leverage and
Capital Structure Policy
(^610) © The McGraw−Hill
Companies, 2002
CHAPTER 17 Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy 583
FIGURE 17.5
Cost of
capital
(%)
RE = 10.22%
Debt-equity ratio
(D/E)
RU = 10%
WACC = 9.6%
RD (1 – TC)
= 8% (1 – .30)
= 5.6%
$1,000/6,300 = D/E
M&M Proposition I with taxes implies that a firm's WACC decreases
as the firm relies more heavily on debt financing:
WACC = ) RE RD (1 – TC)
M&M Proposition II with taxes implies that a firm's cost of equity,
RE, rises as the firm relies more heavily on debt financing:
RE = RU (RU – RD) (D/E) (1 – TC)
WACC
RD (1 – TC)
RE
RU
—E
( V)
—D
( )V
The Cost of Equity and the WACC: M&M Proposition II with Taxes
Because the firm is worth $670 total and the debt is worth $500, the equity is worth $170:
EVLD
$670 500
$170
Based on M&M Proposition II with taxes, the cost of equity is:
RERU(RURD) (D/E) (1 TC)
.20 (.20 .10) ($500/170) (1 .34)
39.4%
Finally, the WACC is:
WACC ($170/670) 39.4% (500/670) 10% (1 .34)
14.92%
Notice that this is substantially lower than the cost of capital for the firm with no debt
(RU20%), so debt financing is highly advantageous.