room at home. On the other hand the stark simplicity of Walter Gropius’s
kitchen in his Dessau home of 1925 – 6 was a direct result of the fact that
it had been organized according to the rational principles underpinning
factory production. The apparent boundaries between private and pub-
lic interior spaces were continually under threat, therefore, as they and
the values they embraced constantly invaded each other’s territories,
taking with them as they did so the visual, the material and the spatial
languages through which those values were expressed. In short the
boundaries between the ‘separate spheres’ were fundamentally unstable
and it was that instability, rather than the separation per se, that, I will
suggest, defined modernity, and by extension the modern interior, reflect-
ing the constantly shifting identities and the increasingly fragmented
experiences of the inhabitants of the modern world.
Unlike the modern painting, the modern poem and the modern
novel, all of whose high cultural forms are fairly easily identified by their
rejection of one set of cultural traditions and values and their adoption
of new strategies, the modern interior, which crossed the bridge between
high and everyday culture, was a much more complex phenomenon. Its
inherent complexity was further compounded by the fact that the modern
interior can be understood in a number of different ways, that is, as an
11
The kitchen in Walter Gropius’s house in Dessau, with furniture by Marcel Breuer,
c. 1925 – 6 , illustrated in Hans Eckstein’s Die Schöne Wohnung: Beispiele Neuzeitlicher
Deutscher Wohnräume, 1931.
006_018_Modern_Intro:Layout 1 30/5/08 15:31 Page 11