126 Christopher Stephens
[Gould and Lewontin, 1979] S. Gould and R. Lewontin. The spandrels of San Marco and the
Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.Proceedings of the Royal
Society of London B205: 581-598, 1979.
[Gould and Vrba, 1982] S. Gould and E. Vrba. Exaptation: A missing term in the science of
form.Paleobiology8: 4-15, 1982.
[Harvey and Pagel, 1991]P. H. Harvey and M. Pagel.The comparative method in evolutionary
biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
[Joseph, 1980] G. Joseph. The many sciences and the one world.Journal of Philosophy, 77:773–
791, 1980.
[Kitcher, 1985]P. Kitcher.Vaulting Ambition: sociobiology and the question for human nature.
MIT Press, 1985.
[Kripke, 1972] S. Kripke.Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972.
[Lack, 1966]D. Lack.Population Studies of Birds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1966.
[Lewens, 2001]T. Lewens. Sex and selection: A reply to Matthen.British Journal for the Phi-
losophy of Science52: 589-598, 2001.
[Lewontin, 1970] R. Lewontin. The units of selection.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
1: 1-14, 1970.
[Lewontin, 1979] R. Lewontin. Sociobiology as an adaptationist program.Behavioral Science
24: 5-14, 1979.
[Matthen, 1999]M. Matthen. Evolution, Wisconsin style: selection and the explanation of in-
dividual traits.British Journal for the Philosophy of Science50: 143-150, 1999.
[Matthen, 2002]M. Matthen. Origins are not essences in evolutionary systematics.Canadian
Journal of Philosophy32: 167-182, 2002.
[Matthen, 2003]M. Matthen. Is sex really necessary? and other questions for Lewens.British
Journal for the Philosophy of Science54: 297-308, 2003.
[Matthen and Ariew, 2002] M. Matthen and A. Ariew. Two Ways of Thinking about Fitness
and Natural Selection.Journal of Philosophy119: 55-83, 2002.
[Maynard Smith, 1978] J. Maynard Smith. Optimization theory in evolution.Annual Review of
Ecology and Systematics9: 31-56, 1978.
[McKitrick, 1993]M. McKitrick. Phylogenetic constraint in evolution: has it any explanatory
power?Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics24: 307-330, 1993.
[Mills and Beatty, 1979]S. Mills and J. Beatty. The propensity interpretation of fitness.Philos-
ophy of Science46: 263-288, 1979.
[Neander, 1988] K. Neander. What does natural selection explain? A correction to Sober.Phi-
losophy of Science54: 422-426, 1988.
[Neander, 1995a] K. Neander. Pruning the tree of life.British Journal for the Philosophy of
Science46: 59-80, 1995.
[Neander, 1995b]K. Neander. Explaining complex adaptations: A reply to Sober’s ‘reply to
Neander’.British Journal for the Philosophy of Science46: 583-587, 1995.
[Orzack and Sober, 1994] S. Orzack and E. Sober. Optimality models and the test of adapta-
tionism.American Naturalist143: 361-380, 1994.
[Peters, 1976] R. Peters. Tautology in evolution and ecology.”American Naturalist110: 1-12.
[Popper, 1963]K. Popper.Conjectures and Refutations. London: Hutchinson, 1963.
[Pust, 2001] J. Pust. Natural selection explanation and origin essentialism.Canadian Journal
of Philosophy31: 201-220, 2001.
[Reeve and Sherman, 1993]H. Reeve and P. Sherman. Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary
research.Quarterly Review of Biology68: 1-32, 1993.
[Rosenberg, 1985]A. Rosenberg.The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge University
Press, 1985.
[Roughgarden, 1979] J. Roughgarden.Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecol-
ogy. New York: Macmillan, 1979.
[Sober, 1984] E. Sober.The Nature of Selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus.
Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984.
[Sober, 1995] E. Sober. Natural selection and distributive explanation: A reply to Neander.
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science46: 384-397, 1995.
[Sober, 1996] E. Sober. Evolution and Optimality – Feathers, Bowling Balls, and the Thesis of
Adaptationism.Philosophical Exchange26: 41-57, 1996.
[Sober, 2000] E. Sober.Philosophy of Biology, 2ndedition. Westview Press, 2000.