426 Marc Ereshefsky
[Ereshefsky, 1994]M. Ereshefsky. Some problems with the Linnaean hierarchy.Philosophy of
Science61, 186–205, 1994.
[Ereshefsky, 2001]M. Ereshefsky.The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical
Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[Ereshefsky and Matthen, 2005] M. Ereshefsky and M. Matthen. Taxonomy, polymorphism and
history: an introduction to population structure theory, 2005.
[Ferguson, 2002]Ferguson, J. 2002: On the use of genetic divergence for identifying species.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society75, 509–519, 2002.
[Forey, 2002]P. Forey. Phylocode — pain, no gain.Taxon51, 43–54, 2002.
[Ghiselin, 1974]M. Ghiselin. A radical solution to the species problem.Systematic Zoology23,
536–544, 1974.
[Griffiths, 1999]P. Griffiths. Squaring the circle: natural kinds with historical essences. In R.
Wilson (ed.),Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, 209–228. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.
[Hennig, 1965]W. Hennig. Phylogenetic systematics.Annual Review of Entomology10, 97–116,
1965.
[Hennig, 1966]W. Hennig.Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1966.
[Henning, 1969]W. Hennig.Insect Phylogeny. John Wiley Press, New York, 1969.
[Hull, 1965]D. Hull. The effect of essentialism on taxonomy: two thousand years of stasis.
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science15, 314–326, 1965.
[Hull, 1966]D. Hull. Phylogenetic Numericlature.Systematic Zoology15:14-17, 1966.
[Hull, 1978]D. Hull. A matter of individuality.Philosophy of Science45, 333–360, 1978.
[Hull, 1987]D. Hull. Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles.Biology and Philosophy2: 168–
183, 1987.
[Hull, 1999]D. Hull. On the Plurality of Species: Questioning the Party Line. In R. Wilson
(ed.),Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, 23 — 48. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.
[Kitcher, 1984] P. S. Kitcher. Species.Philosophy of Science51, 308–333, 1984.
[Kripke, 1982]S. Kripke. Naming and Necessity. In D. Davidson and G. Harmon (eds.),Seman-
tics of Natural Language, 253-355. Reidel: Dordrecht, 1982.
[Mayden, 2002] R. Mayden. On biological species, species concepts and individuation in the
natural world.Fish and Fisheries3, 171–196, 2002.
[Mayr, 1959] E. Mayr. Typological versus Population Thinking. In Evolution and Anthropology:
A Centennial Appraisal. The Anthropological Society of Washington, Washington D.C., 1959
[Mayr, 1969] E. Mayr.Principles of Systematic Zoology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, 1969.
[Mayr, 1970] E. Mayr.Populations, Species, and Evolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Har-
vard University Press, 1970.
[Mayr, 1982] E. Mayr.The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard
University Press, 1982.
[Millikan, 1999]R. Millikan. Historical Kinds and the “Special Sciences”.Philosophical Studies
95: 45-65, 1999.
[Mishler and Bramdon, 1987]B. Mishler and R. Brandon. Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phy-
logenetic Species Concept.Biology and Philosophy, 2: 397-414, 1987.
[Putnam, 1975]H. Putnam.Mind Language, and Reality. Philosophical Papers,Volume 2. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975.
[Rosenberg, 1994] A. Rosenberg. Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science, Chicago:
Chicago University Pressm 1994.
[Ruse, 1987]M. Ruse. Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What?British Journal
for the Philosophy of Science38: 225-242, 1987.
[Simpson, 1961]G. Simpson.The Principles of Animal Taxonomy.Columbia University Press,
New York, 1961.
[Sober, 1980]E. Sober. Evolution, population thinking and essentialism.Philosophy of Science
47, 350–383, 1980.
[Sober, 1984]E. Sober. Sets, Species, and Natural Kinds.Philosophy of Science51, 334-41,
1984.
[van Valen, 1976] L. 0Van Valen. Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks.Taxon: 25:233-
239, 1976.
[Wiley, 1981]E. Wiley.Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics.
Wiley and Sons, New York, 1981.