Homology and Homoplasy 447[de Beer, 1971] G. R. de Beer.Homology: an Unsolved Problem. Oxford Biology Reader No. 11,
Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971.
[Desmond, 1982] A. Desmond.Archetypes and Ancestors. Palaeontology in Victorian London.
1850-1875. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL., 1982
[Di Gregorio, 1995]M. A. Di Gregorio. A wolf in sheep’s clothing: Carl Gegenbaur, Ernst
Haeckel, the vertebral theory of the skull, and the survival of Richard Owen.J. Hist. Biol.,
28: 247–280, 1995.
[Dollo, 1893]L. Dollo. Les lois de l’ ́evolution.Bull. Belgian Soc. for Geol. Palaeont. Hydrology,
8: 164–166, 1893.
[Duboule and Wilkins, 1998]D. Duboule and A. S. Wilkins. The evolution of ‘bricolage’.Trends
Genet., 14: 54–59, 1998.
[Endresset al., 2000]P. K. Endress, P. Baas, and M. Gregory. Systematic plant morphology
and anatomy—50 years of progress.Taxon, 49: 401–434, 2000.
[Evans, 1955]H. E. Evans. The osteology of a worm snake,Typhlops jamaicensis(Shaw).Anat.
Rec., 122: 381–396, 1955.
[Fisher, 1928]R. A. Fisher. The possible modification of the response of wild type to recurrent
mutation.Amer. Nat., 62: 115–126, 1928.
[Fitch, 2000] W. M. Fitch. Homology: a personal view on some of the problems.Trends Genet.,
16: 227–231, 2000.
[Freeman and Martindale, 2002]G. Freeman and M. Q. Martindale. Intracellular fate mapping
and the origin of mesoderm in Phoronids.Devel. Biol., 252: 301–311, 2002.
[Gans, 1985]C. Gans. Differences and similarities: comparative methods in mastication.Amer.
Zool., 25: 291–301, 1985.
[Gegenbaur, 1859]K. Gegenbaur.Grundz ̈uge der Vergleichenden Anatomie, W. Engelmann,
Leipzig, 1859. (2nd edition, 1970).
[Gegenbaur, 1870]K. Gegenbaur.Grundz ̈uge der Vergleichenden Anatomie. Leipzig, 1870.
[Gegenbaur, 1878]K. Gegenbaur.Elements of Comparative Anatomy. (Translated by F. J. Bell),
MacMillan Co., London, 1878.
[Gerhart, 2000] J. Gerhart. Inversion of the chordate body axis: are there alternatives?Proc.
Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 97: 4445–4448, 2000.
[Ghiselin, 1976] M. T. Ghiselin. The nomenclature of correspondence: a new look at “homology”
and ‘analogy”. In R. B. Masterton, W. Hodos, and H. Jerison (eds.),Evolution, Brain and
Behavior: Persistent Problems, pages 129–142, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJ.,
1976.
[Gould, 1970]S. J. Gould, (). Dollo on Dollo’s Law: Irreversibility and the status of evolutionary
laws.J.Hist.Biol. 3 , 189-212, 1970.
[Gould, 1977]S. J. Gould.Ontogeny and Phylogeny. The Belknap Press of Harvard University
Press, Cambridge, MA., 1977.
[Gould, 2002]S. J. Gould.The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard
University Press, Cambridge MA., 2002.
[Greene and Cundall, 2000] H. W. Greene and D. Cundall. Limbless tetrapods and snakes with
legs.Science, 287: 1939–1941, 2000.
[Greer, 1987]A. E. Greer. Limb reduction in the lizard genusLerista. I. Variation in the number
of phalanges and presacral vertebrae.J. Herpetol., 21: 267–276, 1987.
[Gregory, 1913] W. K. Gregory. Critique of recent work on the morphology of the vertebrate
skull, especially in relation to the origin of mammals.J. Morphol., 24: 1–42, 1913.
[Gregory, 1936] W. K. Gregory. On the meanings and limits of irreversibility of evolution.Amer,
Natl., 70: 517–528, 1936.
[Gregory, 1951] W. K. Gregory.Evolution Emerging. A Survey of ChangingPatterns from
Primeval Life to Man. Two Volumes. The Macmillan Company, New York, 1951.
[Guralnick, 2002] R. Guralnick. A recapitulation of the rise and fall of the cell lineage research
program: The evolutionary-developmental relationship of cleavage to homology, body plans
and life history.J. Hist. Biol., 35: 537–567, 2002.
[Haas and Simpson, 1946]O. Haas and G. G. Simpson. Analysis of some phylogenetic terms,
with attempts at redefinition.Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., 90: 319–347, 1946.
[Haeckel, 1866] E. Haeckel.Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundz ̈uge der
organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begr ̈undet durch die von Charles Darwin re-
formite Descendenz Theorie. 2 Volumes, Georg Reimer, Berlin, 1866.