3.8. Comparing Mode-Extraction Methods
The basic equation solved in a typical undamped modal analysis is the classical eigenvalue problem:
φi ωi φ =i
2
where:
[K] = stiffness matrix
{Φi} = mode shape vector (eigenvector) of mode i
Ωi = natural circular frequency of mode i (
ω
is the eigenvalue)
[M] = mass matrix
Many numerical methods are available to solve the equation. Mechanical APDL offers these methods:
3.8.1. Block Lanczos Method
3.8.2. PCG Lanczos Method
3.8.3. Supernode (SNODE) Method
3.8.4. Subspace Method
3.8.5. Unsymmetric Method
3.8.6. Damped Method
3.8.7. QR Damped Method
3.8.8. Storage of Complex Results
The damped and QR damped methods solve different equations. For more information, see Damped
Method and QR Damped Method in the Mechanical APDL Theory Reference.
The Block Lanczos, PCG Lanczos, and Supernode mode-extraction methods are the most commonly
used:
Table 3.5: Symmetric System Eigensolver Options
Disk Re-
quired
Memory
Re-
quired
Eigensolver Application
To find many modes (about 40+) of large models. Recom- Medium High
mended when the model consists of poorly shaped solid
Block
Lanczos
and shell elements. This solver performs well when the
model consists of shells or a combination of shells and
solids.
To find few modes (up to about 100) of very large models Medium Low
(500,000+ degrees of freedom). This solver performs well
PCG Lanczos
when the lowest modes are sought for models that are
dominated by well-shaped 3-D solid elements (that is,
models that would typically be good candidates for the
PCG iterative solver for a similar static or full transient
analysis).
To find many modes (up to 10,000) efficiently. Use this Medium Low
method for 2-D plane or shell/beam structures (100 modes
or more) and for 3-D solid structures (250 modes or more).
Supernode
Release 15.0 - © SAS IP, Inc. All rights reserved. - Contains proprietary and confidential information
Comparing Mode-Extraction Methods