orientation of both the individual response operation and the sys-
tem at large are not sufficiently fast or effective.
It is necessary in dynamic situations, and sometimes only on
the basis of unclear indications or indistinct signals, to take, or
at least initiate, measures before the problem arises. In add ition,
ability is required to reflect over the more transparent patterns in
the course of events, as well as those that are difficult to gain an
overall view of. Even signals indicating possible developments in
the situation need to be evaluated. Depending on the context, dif-
ferent terms are used to express an ability to take measures before
the problem arises. ’Proactivity’ and ’to act instead of parry’ are
examples of these. This is also what control through feedforward
concerns – to act on the basis of a plan without having received
any concrete signals on the actual course of events. When it co-
mes to finalising a response operation, this must be based on solid
grounds. To act only on the basis of indications in this situation
can result in resources being withdrawn too soon.
The capacity to read a course of events needs to per meate the cul-
ture of the organisation. This is a part of tactical approach to
in an anticipative manner handle variations in the risk situation
Time
Damage /
injury
Decision on
measures
Measure applied Measure takes effect
Present
situation
Overv
iew^ of^
course^ o
f^ events
Control entails creating
models, being able to
visualise the whole
course of events and
then applying the right
measure at the right
time in order to achieve
the goal. The overall
purpose of executing
emergency response
operations is to gain
and maintain control.