Sports Energy Bars
These are a convenient source of calories for use before, during,or after exercise.Providing calories is their primary purpose. Most contain about
200 calories per serving/packet.Table 24, below, lists selected sports energy bars. These typifymanufacturer offerings. The inclusion of products and the omission of others is not an endorsement ofthe products listed or a criticism ofthose omitted.Originally conceived as convenient energy sources for fueling
during workouts, niche markets have developed for bars before and after workouts, for women, for those trying to lose weight, for those on 40-30-30 diets, and for those on low-carb diets.The Clif Bar and PowerBar products illustrate some of the many
carbohydrate, protein-carbohydrate, and reduced-calorie offerings.Carbohydrate is the most important and usually main source ofenergy for during-exercise bars. Bars marketed for recovery (after exercise) often contain protein, generally about 20% of calories. Although the marketing of protein for recovery has been heavy, the science underlying marketing claimsis light. For more informationon this topic read the information starting on page66.Energy bar companies attempting to provide calories while also
catering to those trying to lose weight, following the 40-30-30 program, or being part of the low-carb craze present marketingchallenges perhaps best describ
ed charitably as oxymoronic
(described uncharitably as moronic).The only mineral that has consistently been shown to be
important for athletes is sodium. For more information about sweat mineral losses, see page21.Other ingredients are of questionable value. Other ingredients
include anti-oxidants, electrolytes, vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and herbs.Most products are best accompanied by at least 8 ounces of
water to prevent gastrointestinal upset.Although convenient, few non-athletes describe these products
as tasty; some have the mouth feel of cardboard. Although athlete palates may get used to these products, few in the general populationprefer their taste to Milky Wayor Snickers chocolate bars.Easy, relatively inexpensive, tasty, and potentially more
nutritious alternatives include bananas, peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, Fig Newtons, PopTarts,and relatively low-fat chocolatebars like Milky Way.Nutritional contents are based on information provided on the
manufacturers’ websites, accessed October, 2004.Label conflicts are relatively common and are noted. Small
differences may be explained by rounding.The nutritional content of theitalicizedflavor is given.(^)
Nutrition for Sports, Essentials of 103