Sports Energy Bars
These are a convenient source of cal
ories for use before, during,
or after exercise.
Providing calories is their primary purpose. Most contain about
200 calories per serving/packet.
Table 24
, below, lists selected sports energy bars. These typify
manufacturer offerings. The inclusion of products and the omission of others is not an endorsement of
the products listed or a criticism of
those omitted.
Originally conceived as convenient energy sources for fueling
during workouts, niche markets have developed for bars before and after workouts, for women, for those trying to lose weight, for those on 40-30-30 diets, and for those on low-carb diets.
The Clif Bar and PowerBar products illustrate some of the many
carbohydrate, protein-carbohydrate, and reduced-calorie offerings.
Carbohydrate is the most importa
nt and usually main source of
energy for during-exercise bars. Bars marketed for recovery (after exercise) often contain protein, generally about 20% of calories. Although the marketing of protein for recovery has been heavy, the science underlying marketing claims
is light. For more information
on this topic read the information starting on page
66
.
Energy bar companies attempting to provide calories while also
catering to those trying to lose weight, following the 40-30-30 program, or being part of the low-carb craze present marketing
challenges perhaps best describ
ed charitably as oxymoronic
(described uncharitably as moronic).
The only mineral that has consistently been shown to be
important for athletes is sodium. For more information about sweat mineral losses, see page
21
.
Other ingredients are of questionable value. Other ingredients
include anti-oxidants, electrolytes, vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and herbs.
Most products are best accompanied by at least 8 ounces of
water to prevent gastrointestinal upset.
Although convenient, few non-athletes describe these products
as tasty; some have the mouth feel of cardboard. Although athlete palates may get used to these produc
ts, few in the general population
prefer their taste to Milky Way
or Snickers chocolate bars.
Easy, relatively inexpensive, tasty, and potentially more
nutritious alternatives include bananas, peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, Fig Newtons, PopTarts,
and relatively low-fat chocolate
bars like Milky Way.
Nutritional contents are based on information provided on the
manufacturers’ websites, accessed October, 2004.
Label conflicts are relatively common and are noted. Small
differences may be explained by rounding.
The nutritional content of the
italicized
flavor is given.
(^)
Nutrition for Sports, Essentials of 103