If only 40% of her calories consumed that day come from
carbohydrate, full glycogen replacement cannot be achieved.
More Carbohydrate—To a Point
Keep in mind that although carboh
ydrate has been studied for
decades, the role of intramuscular fat is relatively poorly studied. Normally, about 2,500 calories are stored as intramuscular fat.
Typical of many refueling studies, one recent study showed that
increasing calories from 57% carbohydrate to 68% or 88% carbohydrate results in more muscle glycogen after repeated bouts of exercise, in proportion to the amount of carbohydrate ingested.
Although both the 68% and 88% carbohydrate diets increased
intramuscular glycogen, the 88% carbohydrate diet led to decreased muscle triglyceride concentrations.
Absolute Carbohydrate Calories
It is commonly accepted that most aerobic endurance athletes
should consume a diet relatively high in carbohydrate—65% to 70% of total caloric intake.
Many find this approach simplistic, and say it is more important
to ingest enough carbohydrate calor
ies to replace those lost through
exercise. This often amounts to the same thing, but reflects an approach to the reasoning underlying the simplification. For example, it is not that an athlete consuming 4,000 calories per day needs 65% of calories from carbohydrate; it is that 7-10 grams per kilogram per day—up to 2,400 carbohydrate calories for a 132-pound (60 kilogram) athlete—are needed to replace those lost during exercise.
Studies show that although athletes are able to get the percentage
right, based on 7-10 grams per kilogram per day, less than 20% of men and women athletes cons
umed enough carbohydrate.
What Do Scientific Studies Show?
If you look at scientific research, you have to look at research
designed to answer the right questions.
Are you a RAAM rider looking to improve fat metabolism? Are
you a weekend warrior? Are you a recreational rider, riding a few times a week at no more than 75% of your maximum heart rate? Are you a frequent high-end training and racing athlete?
The literature supporting high-carbohydrate diets for high-end
aerobic endurance athletes is massive, international, and accepted.
The literature supporting higher-fat diets is small. The only study
I was able to find concerned athletes who consumed a meal of high (45%) fat vs. low (20%) fat the night before a cycling ergometer test. The riders were rested, were not subject to previous glycogen depletion, and had no breakfast.
40–30–30 proponents often quote this study, saying that it shows
the superiority of increasing fat in the athlete’s diet. One could just as easily say it supports the notion of eating breakfast!
Diet and Health
The current medical wisdom is that reducing fat in our diets is
important for general health. It is
believed that fat contributes to
heart disease and cancer. Fortunately, the high-carbohydrate diet for athletes achieves these very aims.
Insulin and High-Carbohydrate Diets
Proponents of a higher fat diet (for example, the 40–30–30 diet)
point to diabetes and “carbohydrate poisoning.” They claim that high loads of carbohydrate are associated
with high insulin levels. They
say that insulin contributes to the conversion of carbohydrate to fat, and that increased fat stores contribute to insulin resistance and diabetes. Therefore, so the argument goes, we should reduce our intake of carbohydrate.
Nutrition for Sports, Essentials of 50