Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics: Applied Econometrics

(Grace) #1
Efthymios G. Pavlidis, Ivan Paya and David A. Peel 1045

st+ 1 −st=λ 1 +θ 1 (ft−st)+[λ 2 +θ 2 (ft−st)]
×!

(
st−ft− 1 ;γ

)


  • (^) t+ 1 , (22.48)
    where!
    (
    st−ft− 1 ;γ
    )
    = 1 −exp
    (
    −γ(st−ft− 1 )^2
    )


. Equivalently:


st+ 1 −ft=λ 1 +(θ 1 − 1 )(ft−st)+[λ 2 +θ 2 (ft−st)]!

(
(st−ft− 1 );γ

)


  • (^) t+ 1. (22.49)
    Whenst−ft− 1 is small we obtain from (22.48):
    st+ 1 −st=λ 1 +θ 1 (ft−st), (22.50)
    and whenst−ft− 1 is large:
    st+ 1 −st=λ 1 +λ 2 +(θ 1 +θ 2 )(ft−st). (22.51)
    Sarnoet al.(2006) report that the restrictionθ 1 +θ 2 =1 cannot be rejected for
    the currencies they examine and also thatθ 1 <0. Simulated data from this model
    generate negative estimates ofθin the standard regressions (22.36) and (22.37). In
    fact, if the constraint thatθ 1 +θ 2 =1 is imposed, the model collapses to the form
    employing expected excess returns as:
    st+ 1 −ft=−θ 2 (ft−st)exp
    (
    −γ
    [
    Et(st+ 1 −ft)
    ] 2 )

  • (^) t+ 1 , (22.52)
    whenλ 1 +λ 2 =0, whereEt(st+ 1 −ft)is the expected excess return formed on
    information available in periodt. In this form the model allows expectations to be
    formed rationally, as in the arbitrage consistent STAR (ARBSTAR) model proposed
    by Peel and Venetis (2005), which remedies some economic difficulties when TAR,
    ESTAR, or LSTAR models are employed to model arbitrage.^47
    The estimates of Sarnoet al.(2006)^48 suggest that the relationship between the
    excess return and the forward premium is nonlinear. However, it is not clear that
    the efficiency proposition is tested, or indeed that there is a well defined null, except
    under the assumption of risk neutrality. Time-varying risk premia will imply the
    lack of a unit relationship in the outer regimes. It would be of interest to estimate
    the Sarnoet al.(2006) model when risk premia area priorismall – e.g., in credible
    periods in the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM), as in the analysis of Flood and
    Rose (1996) mentioned above.
    An extension of the nonlinear STAR model has recently been employed to model
    forward premia and PPP deviations (see Smallwood, 2005; Baillie and Kapetanios,
    2005, 2006).^49 The idea is that the fractional difference of a series is an ESTAR or
    LSTAR model, and the model is called FI-STAR. In particular, the FI-STAR model for
    a time seriesytis defined as:
    ( 1 −L)dyt=

    ⎝α1,0+
    ∑p
    j= 1
    α1,j( 1 −L)dyt−j




  • ⎝α2,0+
    ∑p
    j= 1
    α2,j( 1 −L)dyt−j

    ⎠G(yt−k;γ,c)+εt, (22.53)



Free download pdf