Tommaso Proietti 399
1960 1980 2000
–5.0
–2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
Real-time cyclical component
1960 1980 2000
–5.0
–2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
Smoothed cyclical component
–20 –10 0 10 20
–0.2
0.0
0.2
Real-time cycle weights
–20 –10 0 10 20
–0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
Smoothed cycle weights
Figure 9.2 Trend-cycle decomposition with correlated disturbances. Real-time and smoothed
estimates of the cyclical components
trend as a random walk driven by the innovationsξt=yt−E(yt|Yt− 1 ). Writing
the ARIMA representation forytasyt=β+ψ(L)ξt,ψ(L)=θ(L)/φ(L), whereφ(L)
is a stationary AR polynomial of orderpandθ(L)an invertible MA polynomial of
orderq, the BN decomposition can be written as:yt=mt+ct,t=1,...,n, where
mtis the BN trend, andctis the cyclical component.
The trend is defined as liml→∞[y ̃t+l|t−lβ], withy ̃t+l|t=E(yt+l|Yt). Writing
yt+l=yt+l− 1 +β+ψ(L)ξt, taking the conditional expectation and rearranging,
it is easily shown to givemt=mt− 1 +β+ψ( 1 )ξt, whereψ( 1 )=θ( 1 )/φ( 1 )is the
persistence parameter, as it measures the fraction of the innovation at timetthat
is retained in the trend. In terms of the observations,mt=wm(L)yt, where wm(L)
is the one-sided filter:
wm(L)=
ψ( 1 )
ψ(L)
=
θ( 1 )
φ( 1 )
φ(L)
θ(L)
.
The sum of the weights is one, i.e.,wm( 1 )=1.
Thetransitory componentis defined residually asct=yt−mt=ψ∗(L)ξt, where
ψ∗(L)=ψ(L)−ψ( 1 ). Alternative representations in terms of the observationsyt
and of the innovationsξtare, respectively:
ct=
φ( 1 )θ(L)−θ( 1 )φ(L)
φ( 1 )θ(L)
yt, ct=
φ( 1 )θ(L)−θ( 1 )φ(L)
φ( 1 )φ(L)
ξt. (9.13)