The Mathematics of Arbitrage

(Tina Meador) #1
2.5 Change of Num ́eraire 29

V. It suffices to show that, for a one-dimensional predictable processL,the
quantitiesLt∆Vtare inK(S). This is easy, since


Lt∆Vt=Lt

(


Ht^0 ,∆St

)


=


(


LtH^0 t,∆St

)


∈K(S)


by definition ofK(S). This shows thatK(Sext)=K(S). 


Lemma 2.5.2.Fix 0 ≤t≤T,andletf∈K(S)=K(Sext)beFt-measurable.


Then the random variableVftis of the form f



VT wheref

′∈K(S).


Proof.Clearly


f
Vt


f
VT

=


1


VT


(


f

VT−Vt
Vt

)


=


1


VT


∑T


s=t+1

f
Vt

(Vs−Vs− 1 ).

We see thatf′′=


∑T


s=t+1

f
Vt(Vs−Vs−^1 ) belongs toK(S

ext) because f
Vt is
Ft-measurable and the summation is ons>t. Hencef′=f′′+fdoes the
job. 


Proposition 2.5.3.Assume thatXis defined as in (2.10). Then


K(X)=


{


f
VT




∣f∈K(S)

}


.


Proof.We have thatg∈K(X) if and only if there is a (d+1)-dimensional pre-
dictable processH,withg=


∑T


t=1(Ht,∆Xt)=

∑T


t=1

∑d+1
j=1H

j
t∆X

j
t. Clearly,
forj=1,...,dandt=1,...,T,


∆Xjt=

(


Stj
Vt


Stj− 1
Vt− 1

)


=


∆Stj
Vt

+Stj− 1

(


1


Vt


1


Vt− 1

)


=


∆Stj
Vt


Stj− 1
Vt− 1

∆Vt
Vt

=

1


Vt

(


∆Stj−Xtj− 1 ∆Vt

)


.


So we get thatHtj∆Xtj = V^1 t


(


Htj∆Stj−

(


HtjXtj− 1

)


∆Vt

)


,whichisofthe

formVftfor somef∈K(Sext)=K(S). Forj=d+1 andt=1,...,Tthe


same argument applies by replacingStjandStj− 1 by 1.


By the previous lemma we haveVft=f


VT for somef

′∈K(S). This shows

thatK(X)⊂V^1 TK(S).

Free download pdf