dividual to the rule of a universal and objective standard.
The logical conclusion is that, since each man’s intuition is
true for him, there is no such thing as an objective truth.
Nor can there be such a thing, in these circumstances, as
an objective goodness. Thus the theory must end in to-
tal scepticism and darkness. The fact that theosophists do
not, as a matter of fact, draw these sceptical conclusions,
simply means that they are not as clear-headed and logical
as Protagoras was.
{155}