Science, Religion, and the Human Experience

(Jacob Rumans) #1

226 life


1904,” in Ames,Life and Letters, 2: 530–531. Ames, a Unitarian minister, was not only
a close friend of the Lesleys but the father-in-law of their daughter.



  1. Lyman, “Biographical Notice,” 2: 473–475, 482. Since 1859 he had held a
    nominal position as professor of mining at the University of Pennsylvania.

  2. J. P. Lesley to Allen Lesley, February 15, 1867, in Ames,Life and Letters,2:17
    (pantheist); Lesley to his son-in-law Charles, March 11, 1888, ibid., 2: 350–351 (God is
    Nature). On Lesley’s connection to Unitarianism, see Ames, “A Memorial Discourse,”
    2: 524; and Davis, “Biographical Memoir,” 166. On his belief in immortality, see Les-
    ley to Susan Lesley, June 18, 1888, and June 24, 1890, Ames,Life and Letters, 2: 359,
    393; and Lesley, “The Idea of Life after Death,”The Forum10 (1890–91): 207–215,

  3. J. P. Lesley to Susan Lesley, July 8 and 9, 1880, quoted in Ames,Life and
    Letters, 2: 253–255; Lesley, Letter to the Editor,Science10 (1887): 308–309; Lyman, “Bi-
    ographical Notice,” 2:472–473. Davis paraphrased Lyman in his “Biographical Mem-
    oir,” 215. Regarding Darwinism, see also Lesley’s essay in theUnited States Railroad
    and Mining Register, December 13, 1873, quoted in Lyman, “Biographical Notice,” 472.

  4. G. Frederick Wright,Story of My Life and Work(Oberlin, Ohio: Bibliotheca
    Sacra, 1916), 116, 123, 132. See also Wright, “Recent Works on Prehistoric Archae-
    ology,”Bibliotheca Sacra30 (1873): 381–384; and Wright,Studies in Science and Reli-
    gion(Andover, Mass.: Warren F. Draper, 1882), 352–354. For Asa Gray’s views, see his
    Darwiniana: Essays and Reviews Pertaining to Darwinism, ed. A. Hunter Dupree (Cam-
    bridge: Harvard University Press, 1963); and [G. F. Wright], Review ofLetters of Asa
    Gray, ed. Jane Loring Gray,Bibliotheca Sacra51 (1894): 182. For Gray’s influence on
    Wright, see G. F. Wright to Asa Gray, June 26, 1875, Archives, Gray Herbarium, Har-
    vard University. This discussion of Wright is taken from Ronald L. Numbers, “George
    Frederick Wright: From Christian Darwinist to Fundamentalist,”Isis79 (1988): 624–
    645, and Numbers,The Creationists, 20–36.

  5. Gray,Darwiniana, 130; G. Frederick Wright, “The Debt of the Church to Asa
    Gray,”Bibliotheca Sacra45 (1888): 527.

  6. George F. Wright, “Recent Works Bearing on the Relation of Science to Reli-
    gion: No. II—The Divine Method of Producing Living Species,”Bibliotheca Sacra 33
    (1876): 455, 466, 474, 487, 492–494. Wright stopped short of identifying himself as
    “a disciple of Mr. Darwin or as a champion of his theory.”

  7. Wright,Studies in Science and Religion, 347–350, 368–370.

  8. G. Frederick Wright, “Some Will-o’-the-Wisps of Higher Criticism,”Congre-
    gationalist, March 12, 1891, 84. See also [Wright], “Professor Wright and Some of His
    Critics,”Bibliotheca Sacra42 (1885): 352. About this time Green turned to B. B. War-
    field and W. H. Green for help in accommodating estimates of human life on earth
    that exceeded the six thousand years commonly attributed to the Old Testament gene-
    alogies. See G. Frederick Wright, “How Old Is Mankind?”Sunday School Times 55
    (January 25, 1913): 52; Wright, “Recent Discoveries Bearing on the Antiquity of Man,”
    Bibliotheca Sacra48 (1891): 309. On Warfield, see Livingstone and Mark A. Noll,
    “B. B. Warfield (1851–1921): A Biblical Inerrantist as Evolutionist,”Isis91 (2000): 283–

  9. On Green, see Ronald L. Numbers, “ ‘The Most Important Biblical Discovery of
    Our Time’: William Henry Green and the Demise of Ussher’s Chronology,”Church
    History69 (2000): 257–276.

  10. G. Frederick Wright, “The First Chapter of Genesis and Modern Science,”

Free download pdf