Reinventing Romantic Poetry : Russian Women Poets of the Mid-nineteenth Century

(Wang) #1
In contrast to earlier works, Robert Southey’s ten-book epic Joan of

Arc( 1796 ), the first Romantic depiction of Joan, presented her in a heroic


light. In Shakespeare’s The First Part of Henry VI ( 1592 ),for example, the


male characters variously refer to Joan as “witch,” “strumpet,” “vile


fiend and shameless courtesan,” “foul fiend of France and hag of all de-


spite,” “railing Hecate,” “giglot [wanton] wench,” ugly witch,” “fell ban-


ning [cursing] hag,” “sorceress,” “wicked and vile,” and “cursed drab.”


In one scene Pucelle, as she is called in the stage directions, conjures


devils to help her defeat the English, and in a second she denies her fa-


ther, who wishes to save her. Elsewhere she falsely claims to be a virgin


and then just as falsely accuses three different men of having made her


pregnant in an attempt to avoid being burned at the stake. That is,


Shakespeare establishes a binary opposition between evil, the feminine,


France, and the rejection of rightful male authority, on the one hand, and


virtue, the masculine, England, and the acceptance of rightful male au-


thority (Henry VI), on the other. Voltaire presents Joan no more heroically


in his semipornographic mock epicLa Pucelle( 1730 ), an account of the


sexual escapades of the French and the English during the Hundred


Years War and especially the supposed fate of Joan’s virginity.^39


Although Southey in his preface to his epic virtuously declares that

he never has “been guilty of looking into [the Pucelle of Voltaire]” (Poet-


ical Works, 1 : 18 ) and does not mention Shakespeare, he appears to be


responding to both. In making Joan the subject of an epic, as opposed


to a satiric mock epic, he could depict her as pure in heart and mind. And


Southey deliberately reverses Shakespeare’s binary oppositions: in his


work female virtue, France, and nature oppose male corruption, En-


gland, and the organized church. Southey’s epic was considered politi-


cally radical and even subversive when it appeared. In his preface


Southey stated that the work was written in “a republican spirit” and in


the belief that “a happier order of things had commenced with the in-


dependence of the United States and would be accelerated by the French


Revolution” (Poetical Works, 1 : 19 ). Discussing his modification of the


epic form he wrote that he had “acted in direct opposition” to the rule


“that the subject [of epics] should be national,” choosing instead for his


subject “the defeat of the English.”^40 Southey further challenged epic


conventions and the conservative politics of his times not only by cre-


ating a female epic hero—a rarity—but also by having her echo


Rousseau’s ideas about the goodness of nature. In book 3 a group of


priests in Chinon examine Joan’s religious beliefs before allowing her to


150 Karolina Pavlova

Free download pdf