Teaching Critical Thinking in Psychology: A Handbook of Best Practices

(ff) #1

Stacie M. Spencer & Marin Gillis


90


A Process Approach to Teaching Critical Thinking Skills

Table 8.1 summarizes a process approach to teaching concepts that can be used specifically


to increase depth of understanding but can also be used to teach transferable critical thinking


skills. In this approach, students systematically progress through Appleby’s six skills by engag-


ing in the process of developing an instrument to measure a specific concept. The use of


instrument development has been used successfully in test and measurement courses (Hynan


& Foster, 1997), and the evaluation of existing measures has been used successfully in a


variety of undergraduate and graduate courses to teach the importance of precise construct


Table 8.1. Process Steps for Teaching Concept Definitions through Instrument Development


Step 1. Concept Definitions


Discussion Topic: Concept definitions


Individual Assessment: Exam items that require students to define and compare/contrast multiple


definitions of the same concept.


Critical Thinking Skills: Retention and Comprehension


Step 2. Instrument Components


Discussion Topic: Components of a measurement instrument


Group Activity: Creation of a new instrument to measure the concept


Individual Assignment: Reaction paper that identifies the definition of the concept that was used


to design the instrument and describes the decisions that were made to design the instrument.


Critical Thinking Skills: Application


Step 3. Reliability and Validity Concepts


Discussion Topic: Reliability and validity


Group Activity: Peer evaluation and feedback of group instruments


Critical Thinking Skills: Analysis and Synthesis


Step 4. Evaluation of Existing Measurement Instruments


Discussion Topic: Differences between professional and lay instruments


Group Activity: Comparison of new instrument to established professional measures


Individual Assignment: Identification of a lay instrument online or in a magazine; reaction paper


that evaluates the strengths/weaknesses of a specific professional and specific lay instrument and


identifies how these instruments differ from one another and from the new instrument.


Critical Thinking Skill: Evaluation


Step 5. Final Project


Group Activity: Discussion of evaluation assignments; Revise original group instrument


Individual Assignment: Reaction paper that provides the concept definition that the new


instrument best reflects, provides a rationale for each component of the instrument, describes


changes made in the revision process, and indicates the sources for those changes (peer feedback,


sample lay instrument, sample professional instrument).


Critical Thinking Skills: Retention, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation

Free download pdf