Critical thinking is not one strategy, but many strategies. It involves the exercise and
development of various skills aimed at bridging the gap between a current and a desired
state (Halonen & Gray, 2000; Sternberg, Roediger, & Halpern, 2007). In psychology, the
aim of teaching critical thinking is often to refine students’ abilities to describe, predict,
explain, and control behavior. But what about writing? How do psychology students’
abilities to express themselves in text form represent critical thinking? Writing is similar to
critical thinking in that it requires the integration and execution of various skills, including
argument, organization, and planning, as well as a working comprehension of grammar
and punctuation rules. Some authors even claim that writing is a form of problem solving
(Flower, 1998; see also Hayes, 2006; Hayes & Flower, 1980), one of the tools in the
critical thinking arsenal.
We believe that writing is simply another form of critical thinking, perhaps a higher
form, because most writers in psychology—both students and professionals—write with
the goal of sharing their ideas with others. That is, they export the transactional nature of
their critical thinking beyond themselves to others. To inform others effectively, writers
must transform their thoughts into prose form, a process requiring not only the aforemen-
tioned skills but a bit of social intelligence, notably the ability to adopt readers’ perspec-
tives to anticipate their questions as well as learning needs.
When developing course activities and assignments, we urge teachers to consider the
scientific reasoning level of their students: An introductory psychology student has a differ-
ent understanding of the discipline than one enrolled in research methods or an advanced
topical seminar (Halonen et al., 2003). The same holds true for the effective teaching and
learning of discipline-related writing skills. Writing activities for first-year students in psy-
chology should be more expressive and exploratory, whereas those aimed at advanced
undergraduates, most often majors, can be more transactional and scientifically grounded.
Our goal in this chapter is to offer a point of view on writing as critical thinking. To do
so, we will discuss the role of critical reading in writing, identify some practical writing
Chapter 14
Writing as Critical Thinking
Dana S. Dunn and Randolph A. Smith
Teaching Critical Thinking in Psychology: A Handbook of Best Practices Edited by D. S. Dunn, J. S. Halonen, and R. A. Smith
© 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN: 978-1-405-17402-2