Teaching Critical Thinking in Psychology: A Handbook of Best Practices

(ff) #1

Critical Thinking


People know what they believe, and they believe what they know. And, in some cases, they


are wrong. For example, many people believe that good students are socially inept loners,


even though ample research has shown that good students display a wide range of desirable


social traits (Stanovich, 2004). And simply providing new information is often ineffective


in changing people’s minds (Anderson, Lepper, & Ross, 1980). Thus it would behoove


students to generate habits of critical thinking about how they acquire and update what


they know. The research methods course is an ideal venue for enhancing such thought.


Critical thinking comprises formulating questions clearly and precisely, gathering and


testing relevant information, recognizing our (and others’) assumptions and perspectives,


and communicating effectively to develop solutions (Scriven & Paul, 2007), all goals


associated with conducting research.


Further, students must learn to differentiate between knowledge that they can trust and


that they cannot. Unfortunately, there is no certain algorithm for such decision making;


there are, at best, tentative heuristics, and critical thinkers must identify their own and


others’ biases and assumptions (Smith, 2002).


As teachers work to engender critical thinking in students, psychology teachers work


toward a particular type of critical thinking: scientific thinking. Recent research indicates


a relatively poor incidence of scientific literacy in the populace, roughly 28%. Surprisingly,


this low value actually represents an increase from 10% since 1988 (Miller, 2007).


Miller’s assessments actually reflect what Maienschein and students (1998) referred to


as science literacy, which is knowledge of scientific material. This type of knowledge differs


from scientific literacy, which is oriented toward process and context, rather than content.


In a broad sense, scientific literacy involves knowledge and understanding of scientific


concepts and processes required for personal decision making and civic involvement


Chapter 17


Why We Believe: Fostering Critical


Thought and Scientific Literacy


in Research Methods


Bernard C. Beins


Teaching Critical Thinking in Psychology: A Handbook of Best Practices Edited by D. S. Dunn, J. S. Halonen, and R. A. Smith


© 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN: 978-1-405-17402-2

Free download pdf