Teaching Critical Thinking in Psychology: A Handbook of Best Practices

(ff) #1

Kevin J. Apple et al.


7878


data each year, faculty members use the assessment data to inform departmental decisions.


To facilitate systematic assessment, we assess our students at three stages during their


academic careers: beginning, middle, and end. The first student assessment occurs before


they begin classes as freshmen. Students complete their midcareer assessment during their


sophomore/junior year on Assessment Day: a day during mid-February each year when


classes are canceled so students can complete their assessments. These first two assessment


batteries focus on students’ mastery of general education learning objectives. Finally,


students complete departmental assessments during their senior year on Assessment Day.


The senior-year assessment focuses on students’ mastery of the learning objectives for their


individual majors.


Assessing Critical Thinking in General Education

Like most U.S. universities, JMU has a core curriculum that all undergraduate students


complete regardless of majors, minors, or preprofessional programs. Faculty have arranged


the general education curriculum into clusters of courses arranged into five educational


themes fundamental to becoming a well-educated student:



Cluster One: Skills for the 21st Century (3 courses)


Cluster Two: Arts and Humanities (3 courses)


Cluster Three: Natural World (3–4 courses)


Cluster Four: Social and Cultural Processes (2 courses)


Cluster Five: Individuals in the Human Community (2 courses)

Critical thinking is assessed in both Clusters One and Three. As part of the assessment


culture at JMU, we are able to benefit from the data our general education colleagues


collect. For Cluster One (Skills for the 21st Century), all students must take one of five


courses designed with the explicit purpose of addressing critical thinking. The assessment


plan for this set of courses has been evolving. Over the years, faculty members have used


various standardized tests, such as the Cornell Critical Thinking Test – Level Z (The


Critical Thinking Company, n.d.) with moderate satisfaction. Since 2005, faculty have


been using the Comprehensive Test of Critical Thinking (CTCT; James Madison


University, Center for Assessment and Research Studies, 2006), developed by Philosophy


faculty at JMU who specialize in critical thinking. They designed the test to probe stu-


dents’ understanding of claims, credibility, conclusions, evidence, and argument. The


CTCT consists of 55 multiple-choice items that have been linked to Cluster One learning


objectives. The Cronbach’s alpha for this test was a = .66 (Fall, 2005) and a = .70 (Spring,


2007). Students completing this test before starting classes (M = 27.6, SD = 5.72) in the


Fall of 2005 scored significantly lower than students during their midcareer assessment


(M = 29.8, SD = 6.12) during Spring 2006, t(888) = 5.51, p < .001. This increase in


critical thinking scores may be attributed to the coursework students have completed since


beginning JMU. The Center for Assessment and Research Studies have shared the data


with the faculty who teach the critical thinking classes, along with more detailed analyses

Free download pdf